I am trying to run my DockerFile and Gradle build inside . I have tried all the ways to do it , but can't understand.
Here is my dockerFile it is working properly, but DO NOT making the gradle BUILD , can someone help me With it:
FROM gradle:4.7.0-jdk8-alpine AS build
COPY . /temp
RUN gradle build --no-daemon
FROM java:8-jdk AS TEMP_BUILD_IMAGE
COPY . /tmp
EXPOSE 8080
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-jar", "/app.jar"]
The output is
'<unknown> Dockerfile: DockerFile' has been deployed successfully.
But it is not building me the Gradle. P.S i am new to DOCKER , and maybe i am doing the wrong stuff in my docker FIle
You have a multistage build here that you need to understand.
FROM gradle:4.7.0-jdk8-alpine AS build
COPY . /temp
RUN gradle build --no-daemon
This will create a docker container, copy the complete docker build context into the container and run gradle. You did not show the complete console output so I can only guess that this ran successfully. Also you did not show your build.gradle file so noone can tell you where to search for the compile result.
FROM java:8-jdk AS TEMP_BUILD_IMAGE
COPY . /tmp
EXPOSE 8080
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-jar", "/app.jar"]
With these lines you create the next stage's docker container, and again you copy your project into the container. But nowhere I see that you would transport the build output from the first stage into the second stage. As this is missing, the resulting container of course does not contain the build result, and you believe it did not happen.
You need to add a line such as
COPY --from=build /whateverPointsToYourBuildOutput /whereverYouWantItInTheContainer
See https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/builder/#copy
Related
I reference an HTML file in my code, and access it with:
Path filePath1 = Path.of("./email.html");
When I run the project locally, the project works fine, and the file loads normally. However, when running the project in a Docker container, I get the following error:
java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: ./email.html
Here is my Docker file for reference
FROM openjdk:11.0-jdk-slim as builder
VOLUME /tmp
COPY . .
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y dos2unix
RUN dos2unix gradlew
RUN ./gradlew build
# Phase 2 - Build container with runtime only to use .jar file within
FROM openjdk:11.0-jre-slim
WORKDIR /app
# Copy .jar file (aka, builder)
COPY --from=builder build/libs/*.jar app.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-Xmx300m", "-Xss512k", "-jar", "app.jar"]
EXPOSE 8080
Thank you for the answers. So this is a Java project, so there is no index.html to add. I tried changing the work directory to /src, but it is still not picking it up
Docker has no access to the filesystem fromm the host OS.
You need to put it in there as well:
COPY ./index.html index.html
There's a couple of options:
Copy the index.html in the docker image (solution by ~dominik-lovetinsky)
Mount the directory with your index.html file as a volume in your docker instance.
Include the index.html as a resource in your app.jar, and access it as a classpath resource.
The last option: including resources as classpath resource, is the normal way webapps work, but I'm not sure if it works for you.
I have this working simple dockerfile.
FROM openjdk:8-jdk-alpine
WORKDIR /data
COPY target/*.jar, myapp.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java","-jar",myapp.jar]
I build my jar using maven either locally or in a pipeline then use that .jar here. I've seen many examples installing maven in the dockerfile instead of doing the build before. Doesnt that just make the image larger? Is there a benefit of doing that?
Usually I have a CICD server which I use for building my jar file and then I generate a docker image using it. Build a jar consumes resources and doing it when you're running your docker container can take longer depending on your configuration. In a normal CICD strategy, build and deploy are different steps. I also believe your docker image should be as lean as possible.
That's my opinion.
I hope I could help you somehow.
I think you are looking for Multi-stage builds.
Example of multistage Dockerfile:
# syntax=docker/dockerfile:1
FROM golang:1.16
WORKDIR /go/src/github.com/alexellis/href-counter/
RUN go get -d -v golang.org/x/net/html
COPY app.go ./
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -a -installsuffix cgo -o app .
FROM alpine:latest
RUN apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
WORKDIR /root/
COPY --from=0 /go/src/github.com/alexellis/href-counter/app ./
CMD ["./app"]
Notice the COPY --from=0 ... line, it's copying the result of the build that happens in the first container to the second.
These mutistage builds are good idea for builds that need to install their own tools in specific versions.
Example taken from https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/multistage-build/
Context:
It's an application written in Kotlin and using Spring-boot with Maven.
Basically, I'd like to know if it makes sense what I'm doing.
Running mvn install then the target folder will be created with the corresponding jar file.
Therefore the Dockerfile will be just copying the jar file into the working directory of the container and run java -jar WHATEVER.jar.
Example of the simple Dockerfile
FROM openjdk:8-jre-alpine
COPY target/app-DEV-SNAPSHOT.jar .
EXPOSE 8089
CMD ["java", "-jar", "./app-DEV-SNAPSHOT.jar"]
But I'd say, makes much more sense to me to use the multi-stage building and in the first stage generate the jar file and in the second stage, execute it. I tried this second approach but I'm facing an issue with main class doesn't exist
Multi-stage Dockerfile:
FROM maven:3.5.2-jdk-8-alpine as BUILD
ENV APP_HOME=/usr/src/service
COPY ./src /usr/src/service
COPY pom.xml /usr/src/service
WORKDIR /usr/src/service
RUN mvn install
FROM openjdk:8-jre-alpine
COPY --from=BUILD /usr/src/service/target/app-DEV-SNAPSHOT.jar ./
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["java", "-jar", "./app-DEV-SNAPSHOT.jar"]
Which one is the correct one?
You should use the multistage dockerfile. Reason being you want to have least dependency on the host system. When you run mvn on host you add dependency of mvn and in turn java.
My recommendation would be to use multistage docker to build in one stage and copy to another stage
I have a Docker file like the following:
FROM openjdk:8
ADD . /usr/share/app-name-tmp
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name-tmp
RUN ./gradlew build \
mv ./build/libs/app-name*.jar /usr/share/app-name/app-name.jar
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name
RUN rm -rf /usr/share/app-name-tmp
EXPOSE 8080
RUN chmod +x ./docker-entry.sh
ENTRYPOINT [ "./docker-entry.sh" ]
The problem is that the final image size is 1.1GB, I know it happens because gradle downloads and stores all the dependencies. What is the best way to remove those unnecessary files and just keep the jar?
I am really confused about your image size. I have typical Spring Boot applications offering a REST service including an embedded servlet container in less than 200MB! It looks like your project dependencies can and should be optimised.
Docker Image
The openjdk:8 (243MB compressed) can be replaced by one with a reduced Alpine unix image like openjdk:8-jdk-alpine (52MB) as a base image but if you don't need compiler capabilities (e.g. don't use JSPs) you may also go for openjdk:8-jre-alpine (42MB) which includes the runtime only, have a look into Docker Hub. I use that for Spring Boot based REST services working great.
Java Dependencies
The Java dependencies needed for compile and runtime have to be included but you may have unused dependencies included:
check your dependencies, are the current compile/runtime dependencies really used or maybe can be removed or moved to test, see Gradle Java Plugin
some dependencies have a lot of transitive dependencies (display using gradle dependencies), check out for unnecessary ones and exclude them if unused, see Gradle Dependency Management. Be sure to do integration tests before applying finally, some transitive dependencies are not well documented but may be essential!
With Docker 17.05+ you can use multi-stage builds.
"With multi-stage builds, you use multiple FROM statements in your Dockerfile. Each FROM instruction can use a different base, and each of them begins a new stage of the build. You can selectively copy artifacts from one stage to another, leaving behind everything you don’t want in the final image."
So your Dockerfile could look like this:
#
# first stage (build)
#
FROM openjdk:8 as build
ADD . /usr/share/app-name-tmp
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name-tmp
RUN ./gradlew build && \
mv ./build/libs/app-name*.jar /usr/share/app-name/app-name.jar
#
# second stage. use alpine to reduce the image size
#
FROM openjdk:8-jre-alpine
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name
COPY --from=build /usr/share/app-name/app-name.jar .
EXPOSE 8080
RUN chmod +x ./docker-entry.sh
ENTRYPOINT [ "./docker-entry.sh" ]
This way you only keep the jar and all the unnecessary files are not included in the final image.
Each RUN instruction creates a new layer on top of the existing file system. So the new layer after RUN instruction that deletes you app-name-tmp directory just masks the previous layer containing the downloaded libraries. Hence your docker image still has that size from all the layers built.
Remove the separate RUN rm -rf /usr/share/app-name-tmp instruction and include it in the same RUN instruction that does gradle build as shown below.
RUN ./gradlew build \
mv ./build/libs/app-name*.jar /usr/share/app-name/app-name.jar \
rm -rf /usr/share/app-name-tmp/*
So, your final Dockerfile would be
FROM openjdk:8
ADD . /usr/share/app-name-tmp
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name-tmp
RUN ./gradlew build \
mv ./build/libs/app-name*.jar /usr/share/app-name/app-name.jar \
rm -rf /usr/share/app-name-tmp/*
WORKDIR /usr/share/app-name
EXPOSE 8080
RUN chmod +x ./docker-entry.sh
ENTRYPOINT [ "./docker-entry.sh" ]
The image built will still add up size from the directory /usr/share/app-name-tmp.
It seems your image comes from
FROM openjdk:8
so from
https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/e6e9cf8b21516ba764189916d35be57486203c95/8-jdk/Dockerfile
and in fact a Debian
FROM buildpack-deps:jessie-scm
you should try to use an Alpine base
https://github.com/docker-library/openjdk/blob/9a0822673dffd3e5ba66f18a8547aa60faed6d08/8-jdk/alpine/Dockerfile
I guess your image will be at least half the size
Is this the container you deploy to production? If so, don't use it for the actual build. Do the build (and the testing) elsewhere and once it is blessed, copy just the JAR to your Docker production container.
For OpenJDK-12
My application is written in Kotlin along with spring boot and maven.
I had same issue with openJDK-12 and OracleOpenJDK-12 size is 470 MB.
I wanted to reduce my container size so i selected adoptopenjdk/openjdk12:x86_64-alpine-jre-12.33 and achieved 189 MB as shown below.
FROM adoptopenjdk/openjdk12:x86_64-alpine-jre-12.33
RUN mkdir /app
COPY ./target/application-SNAPSHOT.jar /app/application-SNAPSHOT.jar
WORKDIR /app
CMD ["java", "-jar", "application-SNAPSHOT.jar"]
My final container size is 189MB (34 MB Application Jar size + 155 MB Base image size.)
I'm trying to deploy our java web application to aws elastic beanstalk using docker, the idea is to be able to run the container locally for development and testing and eventually push it up to production using git.
I've created a base image that has tomcat8 and java8 installed, the image that performs the gradle builds inherit from this base image, speeding up build process.
All works well, except for the fact that the inheriting application container that gets built using docker doesn't seem to cache the gradle dependencies, it downloads it every time, including gradlew. We build our web application using the following command:
./gradlew war
Is there some way that i can cache the files in ~/.gradle this would speed my build up dramatically.
This isn't so much of an issue on beanstalk but is a big problem for devs trying to build and run locally as this does take a lot of time, as you can imagine.
The base image dockerfile:
FROM phusion/baseimage
EXPOSE 8080
RUN apt-get update
RUN add-apt-repository ppa:webupd8team/java
RUN apt-get update
RUN echo oracle-java8-installer shared/accepted-oracle-license-v1-1 select true | sudo /usr/bin/debconf-set-selections
RUN apt-get -y install oracle-java8-installer
RUN java -version
ENV TOMCAT_VERSION 8.0.9
RUN wget --quiet --no-cookies http://archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-8/v${TOMCAT_VERSION}/bin/apache-tomcat-${TOMCAT_VERSION}.tar.gz -O /tmp/catalina.tar.gz
# Unpack
RUN tar xzf /tmp/catalina.tar.gz -C /opt
RUN mv /opt/apache-tomcat-${TOMCAT_VERSION} /opt/tomcat
RUN ln -s /opt/tomcat/logs /var/log/tomcat
RUN rm /tmp/catalina.tar.gz
# Remove unneeded apps
RUN rm -rf /opt/tomcat/webapps/examples
RUN rm -rf /opt/tomcat/webapps/docs
RUN rm -rf /opt/tomcat/webapps/ROOT
ENV CATALINA_HOME /opt/tomcat
ENV PATH $PATH:$CATALINA_HOME/bin
ENV CATALINA_OPTS $PARAM1
# Start Tomcat
CMD ["/opt/tomcat/bin/catalina.sh", "run"]
The application dockerfile:
FROM <tag name here for base image>
RUN mkdir ~/.gradle
# run some extra stuff here to add things to gradle.properties file
# Add project Source
ADD . /var/app/myapp
# Compile and Deploy Application, this is what is downloading gradlew and all the maven dependencies every time, if only there was a way to take the changes it makes to ~/.gradle and persist it as a cache layer
RUN cd /var/app/myapp/ && ./gradlew war
RUN mv /var/app/myapp/build/libs/myapp.war /opt/tomcat/webapps/ROOT.war
# Start Tomcat
CMD ["/opt/tomcat/bin/catalina.sh", "run"]
I faced this issue. As you might agree, it is a best practice to download dependencies alone as a separate step while building the docker image. It becomes little tricky with gradle, since there is no direct support for downloading just dependencies.
Option 1 : Using docker-gradle Docker image
We can use pre-built gradle docker image to build the application. This ensures that it's not a local system build but a build done on a clean docker image.
docker volume create --name gradle-cache
docker run --rm -v gradle-cache:/home/gradle/.gradle -v "$PWD":/home/gradle/project -w /home/gradle/project gradle:4.7.0-jdk8-alpine gradle build
ls -ltrh ./build/libs
gradle cache is loaded here as a volume. So subsequent builds will reuse the downloaded dependencies.
After this, we could have a Dockerfile to take this artifact and generate application specific image to run the application.
This way, the builder image is not required. Application build flow and Application run flow is separated out.
Since the gradle-cache volume is mounted, we could reuse the downloaded dependencies across different gradle projects.
Option 2 : Multi-stage build
----- Dockerfile -----
FROM openjdk:8 AS TEMP_BUILD_IMAGE
ENV APP_HOME=/usr/app/
WORKDIR $APP_HOME
COPY build.gradle settings.gradle gradlew $APP_HOME
COPY gradle $APP_HOME/gradle
RUN ./gradlew build || return 0
COPY . .
RUN ./gradlew build
FROM openjdk:8
ENV ARTIFACT_NAME=your-application.jar
ENV APP_HOME=/usr/app/
WORKDIR $APP_HOME
COPY --from=TEMP_BUILD_IMAGE $APP_HOME/build/libs/$ARTIFACT_NAME .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["java","-jar",$ARTIFACT_NAME]
In the above Dockerfile
First we try to copy the project's gradle files alone, like
build.gradle, gradlew etc.,
Then we copy the gradle directory itself
And then we try to run the build. At this point, there is no other
source code files exists in the directory. So build will fail. But
before that it will download the dependencies.
Since we expect the
build to fail, I have tried a simple technique to return 0 and allow
the docker to continue execution
this will speed up the subsequent build flows, since all the dependencies are downloaded and docker cached this layer. Comparatively, Volume mounting the gradle cache directory is still the best approach.
The above example also showcases multi-stage docker image building, which avoid multiple docker build files.
I
Add resolveDependencies task in build.gradle:
task resolveDependencies {
doLast {
project.rootProject.allprojects.each { subProject ->
subProject.buildscript.configurations.each { configuration ->
configuration.resolve()
}
subProject.configurations.each { configuration ->
configuration.resolve()
}
}
}
}
and update Dockerfile:
ADD build.gradle /opt/app/
WORKDIR /opt/app
RUN gradle resolveDependencies
ADD . .
RUN gradle build -x test --parallel && \
touch build/libs/api.jar
II
Bellow is what I do now:
build.gradle
ext {
speed = project.hasProperty('speed') ? project.getProperty('speed') : false
offlineCompile = new File("$buildDir/output/lib")
}
dependencies {
if (speed) {
compile fileTree(dir: offlineCompile, include: '*.jar')
} else {
// ...dependencies
}
}
task downloadRepos(type: Copy) {
from configurations.all
into offlineCompile
}
Dockerfile
ADD build.gradle /opt/app/
WORKDIR /opt/app
RUN gradle downloadRepos
ADD . /opt/app
RUN gradle build -Pspeed=true
You might want to consider splitting your application image to two images: one for building the myapp.war and the other for running your application. That way, you can use docker volumes during the actual build and bind the host's ~/.gradle folder into the container performing the build. Instead of only one step to run your application, you would have more steps, though. Example:
builder image
FROM <tag name here for base image including all build time dependencies>
# Add project Source
# -> you can use a project specific gradle.properties in your project root
# in order to override global/user gradle.properties
ADD . /var/app/myapp
RUN mkdir -p /root/.gradle
ENV HOME /root
# declare shared volume path
VOLUME /root/.gradle
WORKDIR /var/app/myapp/
# Compile only
CMD ["./gradlew", "war"]
application image
FROM <tag name here for application base image>
ADD ./ROOT.war /opt/tomcat/webapps/ROOT.war
# Start Tomcat
CMD ["/opt/tomcat/bin/catalina.sh", "run"]
How to use in your project root, assuming the builder Dockerfile is located there and the application Dockerfile is located at the webapp subfolder (or any other path you prefer):
$ docker build -t builder .
$ docker run --name=build-result -v ~/.gradle/:/root/.gradle/ builder
$ docker cp build-result:/var/app/myapp/myapp.war webapp/ROOT.war
$ cd webapp
$ docker build -t application .
$ docker run -d -P application
I haven't tested the shown code, but I hope you get the idea. The example might even be improved by using data volumes for the .gradle/ cache, see the Docker user guide for details.
The current version of Docker supports mounting a "cache" and it's local to the Docker environment (so it's not shared with your OS which is both good and bad; good in that there's nothing about your system in the build process, bad in that you have to download again)
This code is from my Spring Docker Swarm integration rework
FROM gradle:7.4-jdk17 AS builder
WORKDIR /w
COPY ./ /w
RUN --mount=type=cache,target=/home/gradle/.gradle/caches gradle build --no-daemon -x test
FROM openjdk:17-jdk as extractor
WORKDIR /w
COPY bin/extract.sh /w/extract.sh
COPY --from=builder /w/*/build/libs/*.jar /w/
RUN sh ./extract.sh
FROM openjdk:17-jdk as sample-service
WORKDIR /w
COPY --from=extractor /w/sample-service/* /w/
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-XX:MaxRAMPercentage=80", "org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher"]
HEALTHCHECK --interval=5s --start-period=60s \
CMD curl -sfo /dev/null http://localhost:8080/actuator/health
USER 5000
EXPOSE 8080
What this does is from my current folder which is a multi-module gradle build I run the build. extractor stage unbundles the JAR file using extract.sh script below.
Then assembles the relevant component
The relevant contents of extract.sh
#!/bin/sh
set -e
set -x
# Remove support projects that won't be a Spring Boot
# rm buildSrc.jar
# rm gateway-common-*.jar
for jar in *.jar
do
DIR=$(basename $jar -0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar)
mkdir $DIR
java -Djarmode=layertools -jar $jar extract --destination $DIR
done
try changing the gradle user home directory
RUN mkdir -p /opt/gradle/.gradle
ENV GRADLE_USER_HOME=/opt/gradle/.gradle