I am trying to count all instances of a substring from .PBAAP.B with P A B in that sequence and can have 1-3 symbols in between them (inclusive).
The output should be 2
.P.A...B
.P..A..B
What I've tried so far is
return (int) Pattern
.compile("P.{0,2}A.{0,2}B")
.matcher(C)
.results()
.count();
But I only get output 1. My guess is that in both cases, the group is PBAAP.B. So instead of 2, I get 1.
I could write an elaborate function to achieve what I am trying to do, but I was wondering if there was a way to do it with regex.
int count = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < C.length(); i++) {
String p = Character.toString(C.charAt(i));
if (p.equalsIgnoreCase("P")) {
for (int j = X; j <= Y; j++) {
if (i + j < C.length()) {
String a = Character.toString(C.charAt(i + j));
if (a.equals("A")) {
for (int k = X; k <= Y; k++) {
if (i + j + k < C.length()) {
String b = Character.toString(C.charAt(i + j + k));
if (b.equalsIgnoreCase("B")) {
count++;
}
}
}
}
}
return count;
To my knowledge, you will only get a boolean response out of a regex match - either it is a match or it isn't. Thus, I can't think of a solution solving your problem using regex.
count() is used, if you want to check if there are multiple matches at different indices - which is not what you want. For instance, the following snippet will return 2 as th is found at 11-12 and at 20-21:
Pattern
.compile("(th)")
.matcher("let's test this together")
.results()
.count();
In order to keep the solution without regex readable and extensible, you may want to use regression.
Class to keep track of the latest match of each letter:
public class Letter {
private char letter;
private int latestMatch;
// constructor
// getters + setters
}
Class to detect different matches:
public class MatchFinder {
final static String C = "......PAA.BBBadsfjksPeAkBB";
final static Letter[] LETTERS = new Letter[3];
final static int SYMBOLS_THRESHOLD = 4;
public static void main(String[] args) {
LETTERS[0] = new Letter('P', -1);
LETTERS[1] = new Letter('A', -1);
LETTERS[2] = new Letter('B', -1);
int count = countMatches(0, C.length(), 0, 0, -1);
System.out.println(count);
}
public static int countMatches(int start, int end, int letterIndex, int currentCount, int latestMatch) {
for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
if (i < C.length()) {
Character c = Character.toLowerCase(C.charAt(i));
if (c.equals(LETTERS[letterIndex].getLowercaseLetter()) && i > latestMatch) {
LETTERS[letterIndex].setLatestMatch(i);
if (letterIndex + 1 < LETTERS.length) {
int childStart = LETTERS[letterIndex].getLatestMatch() + 1;
return countMatches(childStart, childStart + SYMBOLS_THRESHOLD, letterIndex + 1, currentCount, -1);
}
currentCount++;
}
}
}
if (letterIndex > 0) {
int parentLetterIndex = letterIndex - 1;
int latestParentMatch = LETTERS[parentLetterIndex].getLatestMatch();
if (letterIndex > 1) {
int parentStart = LETTERS[letterIndex - 2].getLatestMatch() + 1;
return countMatches(parentStart, parentStart + SYMBOLS_THRESHOLD, parentLetterIndex, currentCount, latestParentMatch);
} else {
return countMatches(LETTERS[parentLetterIndex].getLatestMatch() + 1, C.length(), 0, currentCount, latestParentMatch);
}
}
return currentCount;
}
}
Related
This code works fine but I'm looking for a way to optimize it. If you look at the long string, you can see 'l' appears five times consecutively. No other character appears this many times consecutively. So, the output is 5. Now, the problem is this method checks each and every character and even after the max is found, it continues to check the remaining characters. Is there a more efficient way?
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(longestStreak("KDDiiigllllldddfnnlleeezzeddd"));
}
private static int longestStreak(String str) {
int max = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < str.length(); i++) {
int count = 0;
for (int j = i; j < str.length(); j++) {
if (str.charAt(i) == str.charAt(j)) {
count++;
} else break;
}
if (count > max) max = count;
}
return max;
}
}
We could add variable for previous char count in single iteration. Also as an additional optimisation we stop iteration if i + max - currentLenght < str.length(). It means that max can not be changed:
private static int longestStreak(String str) {
int maxLenght = 0;
int currentLenght = 1;
char prev = str.charAt(0);
for (int index = 1; index < str.length() && isMaxCanBeChanged(str, maxLenght, currentLenght, index); index++) {
char currentChar = str.charAt(index);
if (currentChar == prev) {
currentLenght++;
} else {
maxLenght = Math.max(maxLenght, currentLenght);
currentLenght = 1;
}
prev = currentChar;
}
return Math.max(maxLenght, currentLenght);
}
private static boolean isMaxCanBeChanged(String str, int max, int currentLenght, int index) {
return index + max - currentLenght < str.length();
}
Here is a regex magic solution, which although a bit brute force perhaps gets some brownie points. We can iterate starting with the number of characters in the original input, decreasing by one at a time, trying to do a regex replacement of continuous characters of that length. If the replacement works, then we know we found the longest streak.
String input = "KDDiiigllllldddfnnlleeezzeddd";
for (int i=input.length(); i > 0; --i) {
String replace = input.replaceAll(".*?(.)(\\1{" + (i-1) + "}).*", "$1");
if (replace.length() != input.length()) {
System.out.println("longest streak is: " + replace);
}
}
This prints:
longest streak is: lllll
Yes there is. C++ code:
string str = "KDDiiigllllldddfnnlleeezzeddd";
int longest_streak = 1, current_streak = 1; char longest_letter = str[0];
for (int i = 1; i < str.size(); ++i) {
if (str[i] == str[i - 1])
current_streak++;
else current_streak = 1;
if (current_streak > longest_streak) {
longest_streak = current_streak;
longest_letter = str[i];
}
}
cout << "The longest streak is: " << longest_streak << " and the character is: " << longest_letter << "\n";
LE: If needed, I can provide the Java code for it, but I think you get the idea.
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(longestStreak("KDDiiigllllldddfnnlleeezzeddd"));
}
private static int longestStreak(String str) {
int longest_streak = 1, current_streak = 1; char longest_letter = str.charAt(0);
for (int i = 1; i < str.length(); ++i) {
if (str.charAt(i) == str.charAt(i - 1))
current_streak++;
else current_streak = 1;
if (current_streak > longest_streak) {
longest_streak = current_streak;
longest_letter = str.charAt(i);
}
}
return longest_streak;
}
}
The loop could be rewritten a bit smaller, but mainly the condition can be optimized:
i < str.length() - max
Using Stream and collector. It should give all highest repeated elements.
Code:
String lineString = "KDDiiiiiiigllllldddfnnlleeezzeddd";
String[] lineSplit = lineString.split("");
Map<String, Integer> collect = Arrays.stream(lineSplit)
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Function.identity(), Collectors.summingInt(e -> 1)));
int maxValueInMap = (Collections.max(collect.values()));
for (Entry<String, Integer> entry : collect.entrySet()) {
if (entry.getValue() == maxValueInMap) {
System.out.printf("Character: %s, Repetition: %d\n", entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
}
Output:
Character: i, Repetition: 7
Character: l, Repetition: 7
P.S I am not sure how efficient this code it. I just learned Streams.
I am trying to find patterns that:
occur more than once
are more than 1 character long
are not substrings of any other known pattern
without knowing any of the patterns that might occur.
For example:
The string "the boy fell by the bell" would return 'ell', 'the b', 'y '.
The string "the boy fell by the bell, the boy fell by the bell" would return 'the boy fell by the bell'.
Using double for-loops, it can be brute forced very inefficiently:
ArrayList<String> patternsList = new ArrayList<>();
int length = string.length();
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
int limit = (length - i) / 2;
for (int j = limit; j >= 1; j--) {
int candidateEndIndex = i + j;
String candidate = string.substring(i, candidateEndIndex);
if(candidate.length() <= 1) {
continue;
}
if (string.substring(candidateEndIndex).contains(candidate)) {
boolean notASubpattern = true;
for (String pattern : patternsList) {
if (pattern.contains(candidate)) {
notASubpattern = false;
break;
}
}
if (notASubpattern) {
patternsList.add(candidate);
}
}
}
}
However, this is incredibly slow when searching large strings with tons of patterns.
You can build a suffix tree for your string in linear time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix_tree
The patterns you are looking for are the strings corresponding to internal nodes that have only leaf children.
You could use n-grams to find patterns in a string. It would take O(n) time to scan the string for n-grams. When you find a substring by using a n-gram, put it into a hash table with a count of how many times that substring was found in the string. When you're done searching for n-grams in the string, search the hash table for counts greater than 1 to find recurring patterns in the string.
For example, in the string "the boy fell by the bell, the boy fell by the bell" using a 6-gram will find the substring "the boy fell by the bell". A hash table entry with that substring will have a count of 2 because it occurred twice in the string. Varying the number of words in the n-gram will help you discover different patterns in the string.
Dictionary<string, int>dict = new Dictionary<string, int>();
int count = 0;
int ngramcount = 6;
string substring = "";
// Add entries to the hash table
while (count < str.length) {
// copy the words into the substring
int i = 0;
substring = "";
while (ngramcount > 0 && count < str.length) {
substring[i] = str[count];
if (str[i] == ' ')
ngramcount--;
i++;
count++;
}
ngramcount = 6;
substring.Trim(); // get rid of the last blank in the substring
// Update the dictionary (hash table) with the substring
if (dict.Contains(substring)) { // substring is already in hash table so increment the count
int hashCount = dict[substring];
hashCount++;
dict[substring] = hashCount;
}
else
dict[substring] = 1;
}
// Find the most commonly occurrring pattern in the string
// by searching the hash table for the greatest count.
int maxCount = 0;
string mostCommonPattern = "";
foreach (KeyValuePair<string, int> pair in dict) {
if (pair.Value > maxCount) {
maxCount = pair.Value;
mostCommonPattern = pair.Key;
}
}
I've written this just for fun. I hope I have understood the problem correctly, this is valid and fast enough; if not, please be easy on me :) I might optimize it a little more I guess, if someone finds it useful.
private static IEnumerable<string> getPatterns(string txt)
{
char[] arr = txt.ToArray();
BitArray ba = new BitArray(arr.Length);
for (int shingle = getMaxShingleSize(arr); shingle >= 2; shingle--)
{
char[] arr1 = new char[shingle];
int[] indexes = new int[shingle];
HashSet<int> hs = new HashSet<int>();
Dictionary<int, int[]> dic = new Dictionary<int, int[]>();
for (int i = 0, count = arr.Length - shingle; i <= count; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < shingle; j++)
{
int index = i + j;
arr1[j] = arr[index];
indexes[j] = index;
}
int h = getHashCode(arr1);
if (hs.Add(h))
{
int[] indexes1 = new int[indexes.Length];
Buffer.BlockCopy(indexes, 0, indexes1, 0, indexes.Length * sizeof(int));
dic.Add(h, indexes1);
}
else
{
bool exists = false;
foreach (int index in indexes)
if (ba.Get(index))
{
exists = true;
break;
}
if (!exists)
{
int[] indexes1 = dic[h];
if (indexes1 != null)
foreach (int index in indexes1)
if (ba.Get(index))
{
exists = true;
break;
}
}
if (!exists)
{
foreach (int index in indexes)
ba.Set(index, true);
int[] indexes1 = dic[h];
if (indexes1 != null)
foreach (int index in indexes1)
ba.Set(index, true);
dic[h] = null;
yield return new string(arr1);
}
}
}
}
}
private static int getMaxShingleSize(char[] arr)
{
for (int shingle = 2; shingle <= arr.Length / 2 + 1; shingle++)
{
char[] arr1 = new char[shingle];
HashSet<int> hs = new HashSet<int>();
bool noPattern = true;
for (int i = 0, count = arr.Length - shingle; i <= count; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < shingle; j++)
arr1[j] = arr[i + j];
int h = getHashCode(arr1);
if (!hs.Add(h))
{
noPattern = false;
break;
}
}
if (noPattern)
return shingle - 1;
}
return -1;
}
private static int getHashCode(char[] arr)
{
unchecked
{
int hash = (int)2166136261;
foreach (char c in arr)
hash = (hash * 16777619) ^ c.GetHashCode();
return hash;
}
}
Edit
My previous code has serious problems. This one is better:
private static IEnumerable<string> getPatterns(string txt)
{
Dictionary<int, int> dicIndexSize = new Dictionary<int, int>();
for (int shingle = 2, count0 = txt.Length / 2 + 1; shingle <= count0; shingle++)
{
Dictionary<string, int> dic = new Dictionary<string, int>();
bool patternExists = false;
for (int i = 0, count = txt.Length - shingle; i <= count; i++)
{
string sub = txt.Substring(i, shingle);
if (!dic.ContainsKey(sub))
dic.Add(sub, i);
else
{
patternExists = true;
int index0 = dic[sub];
if (index0 >= 0)
{
dicIndexSize[index0] = shingle;
dic[sub] = -1;
}
}
}
if (!patternExists)
break;
}
List<int> lst = dicIndexSize.Keys.ToList();
lst.Sort((a, b) => dicIndexSize[b].CompareTo(dicIndexSize[a]));
BitArray ba = new BitArray(txt.Length);
foreach (int i in lst)
{
bool ok = true;
int len = dicIndexSize[i];
for (int j = i, max = i + len; j < max; j++)
{
if (ok) ok = !ba.Get(j);
ba.Set(j, true);
}
if (ok)
yield return txt.Substring(i, len);
}
}
Text in this book took 3.4sec in my computer.
Suffix arrays are the right idea, but there's a non-trivial piece missing, namely, identifying what are known in the literature as "supermaximal repeats". Here's a GitHub repo with working code: https://github.com/eisenstatdavid/commonsub . Suffix array construction uses the SAIS library, vendored in as a submodule. The supermaximal repeats are found using a corrected version of the pseudocode from findsmaxr in Efficient repeat finding via suffix arrays
(Becher–Deymonnaz–Heiber).
static void FindRepeatedStrings(void) {
// findsmaxr from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.0528.pdf
printf("[");
bool needComma = false;
int up = -1;
for (int i = 1; i < Len; i++) {
if (LongCommPre[i - 1] < LongCommPre[i]) {
up = i;
continue;
}
if (LongCommPre[i - 1] == LongCommPre[i] || up < 0) continue;
for (int k = up - 1; k < i; k++) {
if (SufArr[k] == 0) continue;
unsigned char c = Buf[SufArr[k] - 1];
if (Set[c] == i) goto skip;
Set[c] = i;
}
if (needComma) {
printf("\n,");
}
printf("\"");
for (int j = 0; j < LongCommPre[up]; j++) {
unsigned char c = Buf[SufArr[up] + j];
if (iscntrl(c)) {
printf("\\u%.4x", c);
} else if (c == '\"' || c == '\\') {
printf("\\%c", c);
} else {
printf("%c", c);
}
}
printf("\"");
needComma = true;
skip:
up = -1;
}
printf("\n]\n");
}
Here's a sample output on the text of the first paragraph:
Davids-MBP:commonsub eisen$ ./repsub input
["\u000a"
," S"
," as "
," co"
," ide"
," in "
," li"
," n"
," p"
," the "
," us"
," ve"
," w"
,"\""
,"–"
,"("
,")"
,". "
,"0"
,"He"
,"Suffix array"
,"`"
,"a su"
,"at "
,"code"
,"com"
,"ct"
,"do"
,"e f"
,"ec"
,"ed "
,"ei"
,"ent"
,"ere's a "
,"find"
,"her"
,"https://"
,"ib"
,"ie"
,"ing "
,"ion "
,"is"
,"ith"
,"iv"
,"k"
,"mon"
,"na"
,"no"
,"nst"
,"ons"
,"or"
,"pdf"
,"ri"
,"s are "
,"se"
,"sing"
,"sub"
,"supermaximal repeats"
,"te"
,"ti"
,"tr"
,"ub "
,"uffix arrays"
,"via"
,"y, "
]
I would use Knuth–Morris–Pratt algorithm (linear time complexity O(n)) to find substrings. I would try to find the largest substring pattern, remove it from the input string and try to find the second largest and so on. I would do something like this:
string pattern = input.substring(0,lenght/2);
string toMatchString = input.substring(pattern.length, input.lenght - 1);
List<string> matches = new List<string>();
while(pattern.lenght > 0)
{
int index = KMP(pattern, toMatchString);
if(index > 0)
{
matches.Add(pattern);
// remove the matched pattern occurences from the input string
// I would do something like this:
// 0 to pattern.lenght gets removed
// check for all occurences of pattern in toMatchString and remove them
// get the remaing shrinked input, reassign values for pattern & toMatchString
// keep looking for the next largest substring
}
else
{
pattern = input.substring(0, pattern.lenght - 1);
toMatchString = input.substring(pattern.length, input.lenght - 1);
}
}
Where KMP implements Knuth–Morris–Pratt algorithm. You can find the Java implementations of it at Github or Princeton or write it yourself.
PS: I don't code in Java and it is quick try to my first bounty about to close soon. So please don't give me the stick if I missed something trivial or made a +/-1 error.
I am trying to count the number of directly repeatings of a substring in a string.
String s = "abcabcdabc";
String t = "abc";
int count = 2;
EDIT:
because some people are asking, i try to clarify this: there are 3 times t in s but i need the number of times t is repeated without any other character. that would result in 2, because the d in my example is not the starting character of t. ('d' != 'a').
Another example to clarify this:
String s = "fooabcabcdabc";
String t = "abc";
int count = 0;
I know how to count the number of occurrences in the string, i need it to be repeating from left to right without interruption!
Here is what i have so far, but i think i made a simple mistake in it...
public static int countRepeat(String s, String t){
if(s.length() == 0 || t.length() == 0){
return 0;
}
int count = 0;
if(t.length() == 1){
System.out.println(s+" | " + t);
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
if (s.charAt(i) != t.charAt(0)){
return count;
}
count++;
}
}else{
System.out.println(s+" | " + t);
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
int tchar = (i- (count*(t.length()-1)));
System.out.println(i+ " | " + tchar);
if (s.charAt(i) != t.charAt(tchar)){
return count;
}
if(tchar >= t.length()-1){
count++;
}
}
}
return count;
}
what am i doing wrong? And is there a better/faster way to do this?
There exists a str.indexOf(substring,index) method in the String API.
In pseudocode this would mean something like this:
declare integer variable as index
declare integer variable as count
while index <= (length of string - length of substring)
index = indexOf substring from index
if index >= 0
increment count
end if
end while
Using indexOf() makes the code much easier:
public static int startingRepeats(final String haystack, final String needle)
{
String s = haystack;
final int len = needle.length();
// Special case...
if (len == 0)
return 0;
int count = 0;
while (s.startsWith(needle)) {
count++;
s = s.subString(len);
}
return count;
}
This version does not allocate new objects (substrings, etc) and just look for the characters where they are supposed to be.
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(countRepeat("abcabcabc", "abc")); // 3
System.out.println(countRepeat("abcabcdabc", "abc")); // 2
System.out.println(countRepeat("abcabcabcx", "abc")); // 3
System.out.println(countRepeat("xabcabcabc", "abc")); // 0
}
public static int countRepeat(String s, String t){
int n = 0; // Ocurrences
for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i ++) { // i is index in s
int j = i % t.length(); // corresponding index in t
boolean last = j == t.length() - 1; // this should be the last char in t
if (s.charAt(i) == t.charAt(j)) { // Matches?
if (last) { // Matches and it is the last
n++;
}
} else { // Do not match. finished!
break;
}
}
return n;
}
Here is the another calculator:
String s = "abcabcdabc";
String t = "abc";
int index = 0;
int count = 0;
while ((index = s.indexOf(t, index)) != -1) {
index += t.length();
count++;
}
System.out.println("count = " + count);
I wrote the following Java code, to find the intersection between the prefix and the suffix of a String in Java.
// you can also use imports, for example:
// import java.math.*;
import java.util.*;
class Solution {
public int max_prefix_suffix(String S) {
if (S.length() == 0) {
return 1;
}
// prefix candidates
Vector<String> prefix = new Vector<String>();
// suffix candidates
Vector<String> suffix = new Vector<String>();
// will tell me the difference
Set<String> set = new HashSet<String>();
int size = S.length();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
String candidate = getPrefix(S, i);
// System.out.println( candidate );
prefix.add(candidate);
}
for (int i = size; i >= 0; i--) {
String candidate = getSuffix(S, i);
// System.out.println( candidate );
suffix.add(candidate);
}
int p = prefix.size();
int s = suffix.size();
for (int i = 0; i < p; i++) {
set.add(prefix.get(i));
}
for (int i = 0; i < s; i++) {
set.add(suffix.get(i));
}
System.out.println("set: " + set.size());
System.out.println("P: " + p + " S: " + s);
int max = (p + s) - set.size();
return max;
}
// codility
// y t i l i d o c
public String getSuffix(String S, int index) {
String suffix = "";
int size = S.length();
for (int i = size - 1; i >= index; i--) {
suffix += S.charAt(i);
}
return suffix;
}
public String getPrefix(String S, int index) {
String prefix = "";
for (int i = 0; i <= index; i++) {
prefix += S.charAt(i);
}
return prefix;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution sol = new Solution();
String t1 = "";
String t2 = "abbabba";
String t3 = "codility";
System.out.println(sol.max_prefix_suffix(t1));
System.out.println(sol.max_prefix_suffix(t2));
System.out.println(sol.max_prefix_suffix(t3));
System.exit(0);
}
}
Some test cases are:
String t1 = "";
String t2 = "abbabba";
String t3 = "codility";
and the expected values are:
1, 4, 0
My idea was to produce the prefix candidates and push them into a vector, then find the suffix candidates and push them into a vector, finally push both vectors into a Set and then calculate the difference. However, I'm getting 1, 7, and 0. Could someone please help me figure it out what I'm doing wrong?
I'd write your method as follows:
public int max_prefix_suffix(String s) {
final int len = s.length();
if (len == 0) {
return 1; // there's some dispute about this in the comments to your post
}
int count = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= len; ++i) {
final String prefix = s.substring(0, i);
final String suffix = s.substring(len - i, len);
if (prefix.equals(suffix)) {
++count;
}
}
return count;
}
If you need to compare the prefix to the reverse of the suffix, I'd do it like this:
final String suffix = new StringBuilder(s.substring(len - i, len))
.reverse().toString();
I see that the code by #ted Hop is good..
The question specify to return the max number of matching characters in Suffix and Prefix of a given String, which is a proper subset. Hence the entire string is not taken into consideration for this max number.
Ex. "abbabba", prefix and suffix can have abba(first 4 char) - abba (last 4 char),, hence the length 4
codility,, prefix(c, co,cod,codi,co...),, sufix (y, ty, ity, lity....), none of them are same.
hence length here is 0.
By modifying the count here from
if (prefix.equals(suffix)) {
++count;
}
with
if (prefix.equals(suffix)) {
count = prefix.length();// or suffix.length()
}
we get the max length.
But could this be done in O(n).. The inbuilt function of string equals, i believe would take O(n), and hence overall complexity is made O(n2).....
i would use this code.
public static int max_prefix_suffix(String S)
{
if (S == null)
return -1;
Set<String> set = new HashSet<String>();
int len = S.length();
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < len - 1; i++)
{
builder.append(S.charAt(i));
set.add(builder.toString());
}
int max = 0;
for (int i = 1; i < len; i++)
{
String suffix = S.substring(i, len);
if (set.contains(suffix))
{
int suffLen = suffix.length();
if (suffLen > max)
max = suffLen;
}
}
return max;
}
#ravi.zombie
If you need the length in O(n) then you just need to change Ted's code as below:
int max =0;
for (int i = 1; i <= len-1; ++i) {
final String prefix = s.substring(0, i);
final String suffix = s.substring(len - i, len);
if (prefix.equals(suffix) && max < i) {
max =i;
}
return max;
}
I also left out the entire string comparison to get proper prefix and suffixes so this should return 4 and not 7 for an input string abbabba.
I have a string, "abc". How would a program look like (if possible, in Java) who permute the String?
For example:
abc
ABC
Abc
aBc
abC
ABc
abC
AbC
Something like this should do the trick:
void printPermutations(String text) {
char[] chars = text.toCharArray();
for (int i = 0, n = (int) Math.pow(2, chars.length); i < n; i++) {
char[] permutation = new char[chars.length];
for (int j =0; j < chars.length; j++) {
permutation[j] = (isBitSet(i, j)) ? Character.toUpperCase(chars[j]) : chars[j];
}
System.out.println(permutation);
}
}
boolean isBitSet(int n, int offset) {
return (n >> offset & 1) != 0;
}
As you probably already know, the number of possible different combinations is 2^n, where n equals the length of the input string.
Since n could theoretically be fairly large, there's a chance that 2^n will exceed the capacity of a primitive type such as an int. (The user may have to wait a few years for all of the combinations to finish printing, but that's their business.)
Instead, let's use a bit vector to hold all of the possible combinations. We'll set the number of bits equal to n and initialize them all to 1. For example, if the input string is "abcdefghij", the initial bit vector values will be {1111111111}.
For every combination, we simply have to loop through all of the characters in the input string and set each one to uppercase if its corresponding bit is a 1, else set it to lowercase. We then decrement the bit vector and repeat.
For example, the process would look like this for an input of "abc":
Bits: Corresponding Combo:
111 ABC
110 ABc
101 AbC
100 Abc
011 aBC
010 aBc
001 abC
000 abc
By using a loop rather than a recursive function call, we also avoid the possibility of a stack overflow exception occurring on large input strings.
Here is the actual implementation:
import java.util.BitSet;
public void PrintCombinations(String input) {
char[] currentCombo = input.toCharArray();
// Create a bit vector the same length as the input, and set all of the bits to 1
BitSet bv = new BitSet(input.length());
bv.set(0, currentCombo.length);
// While the bit vector still has some bits set
while(!bv.isEmpty()) {
// Loop through the array of characters and set each one to uppercase or lowercase,
// depending on whether its corresponding bit is set
for(int i = 0; i < currentCombo.length; ++i) {
if(bv.get(i)) // If the bit is set
currentCombo[i] = Character.toUpperCase(currentCombo[i]);
else
currentCombo[i] = Character.toLowerCase(currentCombo[i]);
}
// Print the current combination
System.out.println(currentCombo);
// Decrement the bit vector
DecrementBitVector(bv, currentCombo.length);
}
// Now the bit vector contains all zeroes, which corresponds to all of the letters being lowercase.
// Simply print the input as lowercase for the final combination
System.out.println(input.toLowerCase());
}
public void DecrementBitVector(BitSet bv, int numberOfBits) {
int currentBit = numberOfBits - 1;
while(currentBit >= 0) {
bv.flip(currentBit);
// If the bit became a 0 when we flipped it, then we're done.
// Otherwise we have to continue flipping bits
if(!bv.get(currentBit))
break;
currentBit--;
}
}
String str = "Abc";
str = str.toLowerCase();
int numOfCombos = 1 << str.length();
for (int i = 0; i < numOfCombos; i++) {
char[] combinations = str.toCharArray();
for (int j = 0; j < str.length(); j++) {
if (((i >> j) & 1) == 1 ) {
combinations[j] = Character.toUpperCase(str.charAt(j));
}
}
System.out.println(new String(combinations));
}
You can also use backtracking to solve this problem:
public List<String> letterCasePermutation(String S) {
List<String> result = new ArrayList<>();
backtrack(0 , S, "", result);
return result;
}
private void backtrack(int start, String s, String temp, List<String> result) {
if(start >= s.length()) {
result.add(temp);
return;
}
char c = s.charAt(start);
if(!Character.isAlphabetic(c)) {
backtrack(start + 1, s, temp + c, result);
return;
}
if(Character.isUpperCase(c)) {
backtrack(start + 1, s, temp + c, result);
c = Character.toLowerCase(c);
backtrack(start + 1, s, temp + c, result);
}
else {
backtrack(start + 1, s, temp + c, result);
c = Character.toUpperCase(c);
backtrack(start + 1, s, temp + c, result);
}
}
Please find here the code snippet for the above :
public class StringPerm {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String str = "abc";
String[] f = permute(str);
for (int x = 0; x < f.length; x++) {
System.out.println(f[x]);
}
}
public static String[] permute(String str) {
String low = str.toLowerCase();
String up = str.toUpperCase();
char[] l = low.toCharArray();
char u[] = up.toCharArray();
String[] f = new String[10];
f[0] = low;
f[1] = up;
int k = 2;
char[] temp = new char[low.length()];
for (int i = 0; i < l.length; i++)
{
temp[i] = l[i];
for (int j = 0; j < u.length; j++)
{
if (i != j) {
temp[j] = u[j];
}
}
f[k] = new String(temp);
k++;
}
for (int i = 0; i < u.length; i++)
{
temp[i] = u[i];
for (int j = 0; j < l.length; j++)
{
if (i != j) {
temp[j] = l[j];
}
}
f[k] = new String(temp);
k++;
}
return f;
}
}
You can do something like
```
import java.util.*;
public class MyClass {
public static void main(String args[]) {
String n=(args[0]);
HashSet<String>rs = new HashSet();
helper(rs,n,0,n.length()-1);
System.out.println(rs);
}
public static void helper(HashSet<String>rs,String res , int l, int n)
{
if(l>n)
return;
for(int i=l;i<=n;i++)
{
res=swap(res,i);
rs.add(res);
helper(rs,res,l+1,n);
res=swap(res,i);
}
}
public static String swap(String st,int i)
{
char c = st.charAt(i);
char ch[]=st.toCharArray();
if(Character.isUpperCase(c))
{
c=Character.toLowerCase(c);
}
else if(Character.isLowerCase(c))
{
c=Character.toUpperCase(c);
}
ch[i]=c;
return new String(ch);
}
}
```