I'm trying to rollback update with #Transactional annotation.
But it doesn't working on any exception.
public abstract class MyService<T1 extends MyDao<T2>, T2 extends MyMapper> {
private final T1 myDao;
public MyService( T1 myDao ) {
this.myDao = myDao;
}
public updateSomething() {
try {
myDao.updateSomething();
} catch (Exception e) {
...
}
}
}
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public abstract class MyDao<T extends MyMapper> {
private final T myMapper;
#Transactional( rollbackFor = Exception.class )
public void updateSomething() throws Exception {
myMapper.updateSomething();
throw new Exception();
}
}
When I throw exception in MyDao.updateSomething(), rollback not working.
I've tried to move #Transactional annotation to MyService.updateSomething() and removed try-catch, it was same.
I saw the transaction rollback log, but nothing was rollback.
[DEBUG ] o.s.j.d.DataSourceTransactionManager[processRollback:833] - Initiating transaction rollback
[DEBUG ] o.s.j.d.DataSourceTransactionManager[doRollback:345] - Rolling back JDBC transaction on Connection [HikariProxyConnection#1241981043 wrapping net.sf.log4jdbc.sql.jdbcapi.ConnectionSpy#1347fc2]
[DEBUG ] o.s.j.d.DataSourceTransactionManager[doCleanupAfterCompletion:389] - Releasing JDBC Connection [HikariProxyConnection#1241981043 wrapping net.sf.log4jdbc.sql.jdbcapi.ConnectionSpy#1347fc2] after transaction
Why rollback doesn't working?
By default Spring rolls transaction back a for RuntimeException, so you should use plain #Transactional and throw RuntimeException if you want to roll back.
Also make sure you don't start another transaction within myMapper.updateSomething().
Related
I have a method, 'databaseChanges', which call 2 operations: A, B in iterative way. 'A' first, 'B' last.
'A' & 'B' can be Create, Update Delete functionalities in my persistent storage, Oracle Database 11g.
Let's say,
'A' update a record in table Users, attribute zip, where id = 1.
'B' insert a record in table hobbies.
Scenario: databaseChanges method is been called, 'A' operates and update the record. 'B' operates and try to insert a record, something happen, an exception is been thrown, the exception is bubbling to the databaseChanges method.
Expected: 'A' and 'B' didn't change nothing. the update which 'A' did, will be rollback. 'B' didn't changed nothing, well... there was an exception.
Actual: 'A' update seems to not been rolled back. 'B' didn't changed nothing, well... there was an exception.
Some Code
If i had the connection, i would do something like:
private void databaseChanges(Connection conn) {
try {
conn.setAutoCommit(false);
A(); //update.
B(); //insert
conn.commit();
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
conn.rollback();
} catch (Exception ei) {
//logs...
}
} finally {
conn.setAutoCommit(true);
}
}
The problem: I don't have the connection (see the Tags that post with the question)
I tried to:
#Service
public class SomeService implements ISomeService {
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate npjt;
#Transactional
private void databaseChanges() throws Exception {
A(); //update.
B(); //insert
}
}
My AppConfig class:
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.jdbc.core.namedparam.NamedParameterJdbcTemplate;
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Autowired
private DataSource dataSource;
#Bean
public NamedParameterJdbcTemplate namedParameterJdbcTemplate() {
return new NamedParameterJdbcTemplate(dataSource);
}
}
'A' makes the update. from 'B' an exception is been thrown. The update which been made by 'A' is not been rolled back.
From what i read, i understand that i'm not using the #Transactional correctly.
I read and tried several blogs posts and stackverflow Q & A without succeess to solve my problem.
Any suggestions?
EDIT
There is a method that call databaseChanges() method
public void changes() throws Exception {
someLogicBefore();
databaseChanges();
someLogicAfter();
}
Which method should be annotated with #Transactional,
changes()? databaseChanges()?
#Transactional annotation in spring works by wrapping your object in a proxy which in turn wraps methods annotated with #Transactional in a transaction. Because of that annotation will not work on private methods (as in your example) because private methods can't be inherited => they can't be wrapped (this is not true if you use declarative transactions with aspectj, then proxy-related caveats below don't apply).
Here is basic explanation of how #Transactional spring magic works.
You wrote:
class A {
#Transactional
public void method() {
}
}
But this is what you actually get when you inject a bean:
class ProxiedA extends A {
private final A a;
public ProxiedA(A a) {
this.a = a;
}
#Override
public void method() {
try {
// open transaction ...
a.method();
// commit transaction
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
// rollback transaction
} catch (Exception e) {
// commit transaction
}
}
}
This has limitations. They don't work with #PostConstruct methods because they are called before object is proxied. And even if you configured all correctly, transactions are only rolled back on unchecked exceptions by default. Use #Transactional(rollbackFor={CustomCheckedException.class}) if you need rollback on some checked exception.
Another frequently encountered caveat I know:
#Transactional method will only work if you call it "from outside", in following example b() will not be wrapped in transaction:
class X {
public void a() {
b();
}
#Transactional
public void b() {
}
}
It is also because #Transactional works by proxying your object. In example above a() will call X.b() not a enhanced "spring proxy" method b() so there will be no transaction. As a workaround you have to call b() from another bean.
When you encountered any of these caveats and can't use a suggested workaround (make method non-private or call b() from another bean) you can use TransactionTemplate instead of declarative transactions:
public class A {
#Autowired
TransactionTemplate transactionTemplate;
public void method() {
transactionTemplate.execute(status -> {
A();
B();
return null;
});
}
...
}
Update
Answering to OP updated question using info above.
Which method should be annotated with #Transactional:
changes()? databaseChanges()?
#Transactional(rollbackFor={Exception.class})
public void changes() throws Exception {
someLogicBefore();
databaseChanges();
someLogicAfter();
}
Make sure changes() is called "from outside" of a bean, not from class itself and after context was instantiated (e.g. this is not afterPropertiesSet() or #PostConstruct annotated method). Understand that spring rollbacks transaction only for unchecked exceptions by default (try to be more specific in rollbackFor checked exceptions list).
Any RuntimeException triggers rollback, and any checked Exception does not.
This is common behavior across all Spring transaction APIs. By default, if a RuntimeException is thrown from within the transactional code, the transaction will be rolled back. If a checked exception (i.e. not a RuntimeException) is thrown, then the transaction will not be rolled back.
It depends on which exception you are getting inside databaseChanges function.
So in order to catch all exceptions all you need to do is to add rollbackFor = Exception.class
The change supposed to be on the service class, the code will be like that:
#Service
public class SomeService implements ISomeService {
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate npjt;
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
private void databaseChanges() throws Exception {
A(); //update
B(); //insert
}
}
In addition you can do something nice with it so not all the time you will have to write rollbackFor = Exception.class. You can achieve that by writing your own custom annotation:
#Target({ElementType.TYPE, ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE})
#Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
#Documented
public #interface CustomTransactional {
}
The final code will be like that:
#Service
public class SomeService implements ISomeService {
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate;
#Autowired
private NamedParameterJdbcTemplate npjt;
#CustomTransactional
private void databaseChanges() throws Exception {
A(); //update
B(); //insert
}
}
The first code you present is for UserTransactions, i.e. the application has to do the transaction management. Usually you want the container to take care of that and use the #Transactional annotation. I think the problem in you case might be, that you have the annotation on a private method. I'd move the annotation to the class level
#Transactional
public class MyFacade {
public void databaseChanges() throws Exception {
A(); //update.
B(); //insert
}
Then it should rollback properly. You can find more details here
Does Spring #Transactional attribute work on a private method?
Try this:
#TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.BEAN)
public class MyFacade {
#TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttribute.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void databaseChanges() throws Exception {
A(); //update.
B(); //insert
}
What you seem to be missing is a TransactionManager. The purpose of the TransactionManager is to be able to manage database transactions. There are 2 types of transactions, programmatic and declarative. What you are describing is a need for a declarative transaction via annotations.
So what you need to be in place for your project is the following:
Spring Transactions Dependency (Using Gradle as example)
compile("org.springframework:spring-tx")
Define a Transaction Manager in Spring Boot Configuration
Something like this
#Bean
public PlatformTransactionManager transactionManager(DataSource dataSource)
{
return new DataSourceTransactionManager(dataSource);
}
You would also need to add the #EnableTransactionManagement annotation (not sure if this is for free in newer versions of spring boot.
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class AppConfig {
...
}
Add #Transactional
Here you would add the #Transactional annotation for the method that you want to participate in the transaction
#Transactional
public void book(String... persons) {
for (String person : persons) {
log.info("Booking " + person + " in a seat...");
jdbcTemplate.update("insert into BOOKINGS(FIRST_NAME) values (?)", person);
}
};
Note that this method should be public and not private. You may want to consider putting #Transactional on the public method calling databaseChanges().
There are also advanced topics about where #Transactional should go and how it behaves, so better to get something working first and then explore this area a bit later:)
After all these are in place (dependency + transactionManager configuration + annotation), then transactions should work accordingly.
References
Spring Reference Documentation on Transactions
Spring Guide for Transactions using Spring Boot - This has sample code that you can play with
Modification of bean attribute not rollbacked with spring #Transactional
TestController.java
#RestController
public class TestController {
#Autowired
private TestService testService;
#Autowired
private TestBean testBean;
#RequestMapping(value = "/test")
public String testTransaction() {
try{
testService.testTransaction();
}catch(Exception e){
System.out.println("After exception: " + testBean.getAttribute());
}
return "test"
}
}
TestService.java
#Service
public class TestService {
#Autowired
private TestBean testBean;
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
public void testTransaction() {
testBean.increment();
System.out.println("Before exception: " + testBean.getAttribute());
throw new UnexpectedRollbackException("unexpected exception");
}
}
TestBean.java
#Component
public class TestBean {
private int attribute = 0;
public TestBean() {
}
public void increment () {
attribute++;
}
public int getAttribute() {
return attribute;
}
}
Console Log
Before exception: 1
After exception: 1
I m wondering why the attribute value is not rollbacked to 0 (its initial value).
You cannot test the #Transactional annotation with this way, you need to have database connection. The rollback process is on the database, not on the objects or beans(if there is, i don't know). Firstly get the database connection, after that, type the some code that is deal with your database in your Service like obj.save() or obj.update(other_obj), also throw the Exception in this method. In Controller, invoke your that service method and control your own database whether the data is saved or not.
Spring use the rollback mechanism for RunTimeException or its sub-classes.
you can find some my spring training here.
#Transactional manages database transactions. Typically you have a data source bean. This bean manages connections to your database. On top of this bean you have a transaction manager. It is another bean which together with #Transactional annotation checks your methods which are supposed to run within transactions. If your method ends with an exception the transaction manager will do rollback of underlying database transaction.
You can find more details in the documentation here
My runtime exception
#ApplicationException(rollback=false)
public class UncheckedException extends RuntimeException {}
My EJB code
#Stateless
#Transactional(TxType.REQUIRES_NEW)
public class ContainerManagedTransactionBean {
#PersistenceContext EntityManager em;
public void insertAndThrowUnchecked() throws UncheckedException {
em.persist(new Entry());
throw new UncheckedException();
}
}
My another EJB is client
#Singleton
#Startup
#Transactional(TxType.NOT_SUPPORTED)
public class Start {
#EJB
ContainerManagedTransactionBean bean;
#PostConstruct
public void start() {
//...
try {
bean.insertAndThrowUnchecked();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println("Start unchecked exception catched");
}
}
Could someone explain me why insertAndThrowUnchecked is rolled back?
In similar case, when exception is checked,
#ApplicationException(rollback=false)
public class CheckedException extends Exception {}
transaction is committed.
Working example is at this GitHub link.
I will appreciate clear explanation and link to proper part of EJB specification
Per section 7.1 of the EJB 3.2 specification:
It is illegal to associate JTA transactional interceptors (see [8])
with Enterprise JavaBeans. The EJB Container should fail deployment of
such applications.[39]
[39] This restriction may be removed in a future release of this specification.
Since the #Transactional annotation is incorrectly being used to specify a JTA transaction interceptor on an EJB , the #ApplicationException annotation has no effect. Try using the #TransactionAttribute annotation instead.
I'm developing a web app with Spring MVC and hibernate for persistence.
Given my DAO where GenericDao has a SessionFactory member attribute:
#Repository
public class Dao extends GenericDao {
public void save(Object o) {
getCurrentSession().save(o);
}
}
And a Service class
#Service
public class MyService {
#Autowired
Dao dao;
#Transactional
public void save(Object o) {
dao.save(o);
}
}
I want to inform my user if a persistence exception occurs (constraint, duplicate, etc). As far as I know, the #Transactional annotation only works if the exception bubbles up and the transaction manager rolls back so I shouldn't be handling the exception in that method. Where and how should I catch an exception that would've happened in the DAO so that I can present it to my user, either directly or wrapped in my own exception?
I want to use spring's transaction support.
Spring provides Exception Handlers.
http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.x/spring-framework-reference/html/mvc.html#mvc-exceptionhandlers
So you could have something like this in your controller to handle a ConstraintViolationException
#ExceptionHandler(ConstraintViolationException.class)
public ModelAndView handleConstraintViolationException(IOException ex, Command command, HttpServletRequest request)
{
return new ModelAndView("ConstraintViolationExceptionView");
}
After chasing around the issue for a while, I solved this by using an exception handler (as described in another answer) and the rollbackFor property of the #Transactional annotation:
#Transactional(rollbackFor = Exception.class)
My exception handler is still called and writes the response accordingly, but the transaction is rolled back.
My problem is simple, I want to rollback all the db changes that were caused by invocation of my service method. I have a problem with correct annotating. I'm not really sure where to put #Transactional and where should I set Propagation to REQUIRES_NEW or MANDATORY. I will paste a code that I wrote, which apart from the fact that SQLException is thrown does not rollback db changes.
The code:
#Service
public class SwapInsertService {
#Autowired
MyDao myDao;
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQURIES_NEW, rollbackFor = SQLException.class)
public void insertToManyTables(MyData data) throws SQLException {
insertToSpecificTables(data);
myDao.insertTwo(data);
}
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY)
public void insertToSpecificTables(MyData data) throws SQLException {
myDao.insertOne(data);
}
}
#Repository
public class MyDaoImpl implements MyDao {
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY)
public void insertOne(MyData data) throws SQLException {
// INSERT
}
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.MANDATORY)
public void insertTwo(MyData data) throws SQLException {
// throws SQLException
}
}
Let's assume insertTwo throws SQLException . I would like to rollback all the previous inserts. What am I doing wrong?
My understanding:
Propagation.REQURIES_NEW creates new transaction.
Propagation.MANDATORY supports current transaction.
insertTwo throws error, insertToManyTables rollbacks everything and voilĂ . Unfortunately it is not that easy.
EDIT: It's important to mention that i'm using CGLIB for proxies.
Check whether AUTO_COMMIT is set to false in data source configuration in spring specific xml