Develop Reference

Hadoop edge node Issues [duplicate]

I am getting the following error on execution of a multi-threading program
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
The above error occured in one of the threads.
Upto my knowledge, Heap space is occupied by instance variables only. If this is correct, then why this error occurred after running fine for sometime as space for instance variables are alloted at the time of object creation.
Is there any way to increase the heap space?
What changes should I made to my program so that It will grab less heap space?

If you want to increase your heap space, you can use java -Xms<initial heap size> -Xmx<maximum heap size> on the command line. By default, the values are based on the JRE version and system configuration. You can find out more about the VM options on the Java website.
However, I would recommend profiling your application to find out why your heap size is being eaten. NetBeans has a very good profiler included with it. I believe it uses the jvisualvm under the hood. With a profiler, you can try to find where many objects are being created, when objects get garbage collected, and more.

1.- Yes, but it pretty much refers to the whole memory used by your program.
2.- Yes see Java VM options
-Xms<size> set initial Java heap size
-Xmx<size> set maximum Java heap size
Ie
java -Xmx2g assign 2 gigabytes of ram as maximum to your app
But you should see if you don't have a memory leak first.
3.- It depends on the program. Try spot memory leaks. This question would be to hard to answer. Lately you can profile using JConsole to try to find out where your memory is going to

You may want to look at this site to learn more about memory in the JVM:
http://developer.streamezzo.com/content/learn/articles/optimization-heap-memory-usage
I have found it useful to use visualgc to watch how the different parts of the memory model is filling up, to determine what to change.
It is difficult to determine which part of memory was filled up, hence visualgc, as you may want to just change the part that is having a problem, rather than just say,
Fine! I will give 1G of RAM to the JVM.
Try to be more precise about what you are doing, in the long run you will probably find the program better for it.
To determine where the memory leak may be you can use unit tests for that, by testing what was the memory before the test, and after, and if there is too big a change then you may want to examine it, but, you need to do the check while your test is still running.

You can get your heap memory size through below programe.
public class GetHeapSize {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long heapsize = Runtime.getRuntime().totalMemory();
System.out.println("heapsize is :: " + heapsize);
}
}
then accordingly you can increase heap size also by using:
java -Xmx2g
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html

To increase the heap size you can use the -Xmx argument when starting Java; e.g.
-Xmx256M

Upto my knowledge, Heap space is occupied by instance variables only. If this is correct, then why this error occurred after running fine for sometime as space for instance variables are alloted at the time of object creation.
That means you are creating more objects in your application over a period of time continuously. New objects will be stored in heap memory and that's the reason for growth in heap memory.
Heap not only contains instance variables. It will store all non-primitive data types ( Objects). These objects life time may be short (method block) or long (till the object is referenced in your application)
Is there any way to increase the heap space?
Yes. Have a look at this oracle article for more details.
There are two parameters for setting the heap size:
-Xms:, which sets the initial and minimum heap size
-Xmx:, which sets the maximum heap size
What changes should I made to my program so that It will grab less heap space?
It depends on your application.
Set the maximum heap memory as per your application requirement
Don't cause memory leaks in your application
If you find memory leaks in your application, find the root cause with help of profiling tools like MAT, Visual VM , jconsole etc. Once you find the root cause, fix the leaks.
Important notes from oracle article
Cause: The detail message Java heap space indicates object could not be allocated in the Java heap. This error does not necessarily imply a memory leak.
Possible reasons:
Improper configuration ( not allocating sufficiant memory)
Application is unintentionally holding references to objects and this prevents the objects from being garbage collected
Applications that make excessive use of finalizers. If a class has a finalize method, then objects of that type do not have their space reclaimed at garbage collection time. If the finalizer thread cannot keep up, with the finalization queue, then the Java heap could fill up and this type of OutOfMemoryError exception would be thrown.
On a different note, use better Garbage collection algorithms ( CMS or G1GC)
Have a look at this question for understanding G1GC

In most of the cases, the code is not optimized. Release those objects which you think shall not be needed further. Avoid creation of objects in your loop each time. Try to use caches. I don't know how your application is doing. But In programming, one rule of normal life applies as well
Prevention is better than cure. "Don't create unnecessary objects"

Local variables are located on the stack. Heap space is occupied by objects.
You can use the -Xmx option.
Basically heap space is used up everytime you allocate a new object with new and freed some time after the object is no longer referenced. So make sure that you don't keep references to objects that you no longer need.

No, I think you are thinking of stack space. Heap space is occupied by objects. The way to increase it is -Xmx256m, replacing the 256 with the amount you need on the command line.

To avoid that exception, if you are using JUnit and Spring try adding this in every test class:
#DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_CLASS)

I have tried all Solutions but nothing worked from above solutions
Solution: In My case I was using 4GB RAM and due to that RAM usage comes out 98% so the required amount if Memory wasn't available. Please do look for this also.If such issue comes upgrade RAM and it will work fine.
Hope this will save someone Time

In netbeans, Go to 'Run' toolbar, --> 'Set Project Configuration' --> 'Customise' --> 'run' of its popped up windo --> 'VM Option' --> fill in '-Xms2048m -Xmx2048m'. It could solve heap size problem.

Setting a smaller JVM heap size within a JNI client application

I'm attempting to debug a problem with pl/java, a procedural language for PostgreSQL. I'm running this stack on a Linux server.
Essentially, each Postgres backend (connection process) must start its own JVM, and does so using the JNI. This is generally a major limitation of pl/java, but it has one particularly nasty manifestation.
If native memory runs out (I realise that this may not actually be due to malloc() returning NULL, but the effect is about the same), this failure is handled rather poorly. It results in an OutOfMemoryError due to "native memory exhaustion". This results in a segfault of the Postgres backend, originating from within libjvm.so, and a javacore file that says something like:
0SECTION TITLE subcomponent dump routine
NULL ===============================
1TISIGINFO Dump Event "systhrow" (00040000) Detail "java/lang/OutOfMemoryError" "Failed to create a thread: retVal -1073741830, errno 11" received
1TIDATETIME Date: 2012/09/13 at 16:36:01
1TIFILENAME Javacore filename: /var/lib/PostgreSQL/9.1/data/javacore.20120913.104611.24742.0002.txt
***SNIP***
Now, there are reasonably well-defined ways of ameliorating these types of problems with Java, described here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-nativememory-linux/
I think that it would be particularly effective if I could set the maximum heap size to a value that is far lower than the default. Ordinarily, it is possible to do something along these lines:
The heap's size is controlled from the Java command line using the -Xmx and -Xms options (mx is the maximum size of the heap, ms is the initial size). Although the logical heap (the area of memory that is actively used) can grow and shrink according to the number of objects on the heap and the amount of time spent in GC, the amount of native memory used remains constant and is dictated by the -Xmx value: the maximum heap size. Most GC algorithms rely on the heap being allocated as a contiguous slab of memory, so it's impossible to allocate more native memory when the heap needs to expand. All heap memory must be reserved up front.
However, it is not apparent how I can follow these steps such that pl/java's JNI initialisation initialises a JVM with a smaller heap; I can't very well pass these command line arguments to Postgres. So, my question is, how can I set the maximum heap size or otherwise control these problems in this context specifically? This appears to be a general problem with pl/java, so I expect to be able to share whatever solution I eventually arrive at with the Postgres community.
Please note that I am not experienced with JVM internals, and am not generally familiar with Java.
Thanks

According to slide 19 in this presentation postgresql.conf can have the parameter pljava.vmoptions where you can pass arguments to the JVM.

Java String objects not getting garbage collected on time

I have an interesting problem with Java memory consumption. I have a native C++ application which invokes my Java application.
The Application basically does some language translations\parses a few XML's and responds to network requests. Most of the state of Application doesn't have to be retained so it is full of Methods which take in String arguments and returns string results.
This application continues to take more and more memory with time and there comes a time where it starts to take close to 2 GB memory, which made us suspect that there is a leak somewhere in some Hashtable or static variables. On closer inspection we did not find any leaks. Comparing heap dumps over a period of time, shows the char[] and String objects take huge memory.
However when we inspect these char[], Strings we find that they do not have GC roots which means that they shouldn't be the cause of leak. Since they are a part of heap, it means they are waiting to get garbage collected. After using verious tools MAT\VisualVM\JHat and scrolling through a lot of such objects I used the trial version of yourkit. Yourkit gives the data straightaway saying that 96% of the char[] and String are unreachable. Which means that at the time of taking dump 96% of the Strings in the heap were waiting to get garbage collected.
I understand that the GC runs sparingly but when you check via VisualVM you can actually see it running :-( than how come there are so many unused objects on the heap all time.
IMO this Application should never take more than 400-500 MB memory, which is where it stays for the first 24 hours but than it continues to increase the heap :-(
I am running Java 1.6.0-25.
thanks for any help.

Java doesn't GC when you think it does/should :-) GC is too complex a topic to understand what is going on without spending a couple of weeks really digging into the details. So if you see behavior that you can't explain, that doesn't mean its broken.
What you see can have several reasons:
You are loading a huge String into memory and keep a reference to a substring. That can keep the whole string in memory (Java doesn't always allocate a new char array for substrings - since Strings are immutable, it simply reuses the original char array and remembers the offset and length).
Nothing triggered the GC so far. Some C++ developers believe GC is "evil" (anything that you don't understand must be evil, right?) so they configure Java not to run it unless absolutely necessary. This means the VM will eat memory until it hits the maximum and then, it will do one huge GC run.
build 25 is already pretty old. Try to update to the latest Java build (33, I think). The GC is one of the best tested parts of the VM but it does have bugs. Maybe you hit one.
Unless you see OutOfMemoryException, you don't have a leak. We have an application which eats all the heap you give it. If it gets 16GB of RAM ("just to be safe"), it will use the whole 16GB because we cache what we can. You never see out of memory, because the cache will shrink as needed but system admins routinely freak out "oh god! oh god! It's running out of memory" PANIK No, it's not. Unless Java tells you so, it's not running out of memory. It's just using it efficiently.
Tuning the GC with command line options is one of the best ways to break it. Hundreds of people which know a lot more about the topic than you ever will spent years making the GC efficient. You think you can do better? Good luck. -> Get rid of any "magic" command line options and calls to System.gc() and your problem might go away.

Try decreasing the heap size to 500 Megabytes and see if the software will start garbage collecting or die. Java isnt too fussy about using memory given to it. you might also research GC tuning options which will make the GC more prudent about cleaning stuff up.

String reallyLongString = "this is a really long String";
String tinyString = reallyLongString.substring(2, 3);
reallyLongString = null
The JVM can't collect the memory allocated for the long string in the above case, since there's a reference to part of it.
If you're doing stuff with Strings and you're suffering from memory issues, this might be the cause of your grief.
use tinyString = new String(reallyLongString.substring(2, 3); instead.

There might not be a leak at all - a leak would be if the Strings were reachable. If you've allocated as much as 2GB to the application, there is no reason for the garbage collector to start freeing up memory until you are approaching that limit. If you don't want it taking any more than 500MB, then pass -Xmx 512m when starting the JVM.
You could also try tuning the garbage collector to start cleaning up much earlier.

First of all, stop worrying about those Strings and char[]. In almost every java application I have profiled, they are on the top of memory consumer list. And in almost no of those java application they were the real problem.
If you have not received OutOfMemoryError yet, but do worry that 2GB is too much for your java process, then try to decrease Xmx value you pass to it. If it runs well and good with 512m or 1g, then problem solved, isn't it?
If you get OOM, then one more option you can try is to use Plumbr with your java process. It is memory leak discovery tool, to it can help you if there really is a memory leak.

Simple Class - Is it a Memory Leak?

I've a very simple class which has one integer variable. I just print the value of variable 'i' to the screen and increment it, and make the thread sleep for 1 second. When I run a profiler against this method, the memory usage increases slowly even though I'm not creating any new variables. After executing this code for around 16 hours, I see that the memory usage had increased to 4 MB (initially 1 MB when I started the program). I'm a novice in Java. Could any one please help explain where am I going wrong, or why the memory usage is gradually increasing even when there are no new variables created? Thanks in advance.
I'm using netbeans 7.1 and its profiler to view the memory usage.
public static void main(String[] args)
{
try
{
int i = 1;
while(true)
{
System.out.println(i);
i++;
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
}
catch(InterruptedException ex)
{
System.out.print(ex.toString());
}
}
Initial memory usage when the program started : 1569852 Bytes.
Memory usage after executing the loop for 16 hours : 4095829 Bytes

It is not necessarily a memory leak. When the GC runs, the objects that are allocated (I presume) in the System.out.println(i); statement will be collected. A memory leak in Java is when memory fills up with useless objects that can't be reclaimed by the GC.
The println(i) is using Integer.toString(int) to convert the int to a String, and that is allocating a new String each time. That is not a leak, because the String will become unreachable and a candidate for GC'ing once it has been copied to the output buffer.
Other possible sources of memory allocation:
Thread.sleep could be allocating objects under the covers.
Some private JVM thread could be causing this.
The "java agent" code that the profiler is using to monitor the JVM state could be causing this. It has to assemble and send data over a socket to the profiler application, and that could well involve allocating Java objects. It may also be accumulating stuff in the JVM's heap or non-heap memory.
But it doesn't really matter so long as the space can be reclaimed if / when the GC runs. If it can't, then you may have found a JVM bug or a bug in the profiler that you are using. (Try replacing the loop with one very long sleep and see if the "leak" is still there.) And it probably doesn't matter if this is a slow leak caused by profiling ... because you don't normally run production code with profiling enabled for that long.
Note: calling System.gc() is not guaranteed to cause the GC to run. Read the javadoc.

I don't see any memory leak in this code. You should see how Garbage collector in Java works and at its strategies. Very basically speaking GC won't clean up until it is needed - as indicated in particular strategy.
You can also try to call System.gc().
The objects are created probably in the two Java Core functions.

It's due to the text displayed in the console, and the size of the integer (a little bit).
Java print functions use 8-bit ASCII, therefor 56000 prints of a number, at 8 bytes each char will soon rack up memory.

Follow this tutorial to find your memory leak: Analyzing Memory Leak in Java Applications using VisualVM. You have to make a snapshot of your application at the start and another one after some time. With VisualVM you can do this and compare these to snapshots.

Try setting the JVM upper memory limit so low that the possible leak will cause it to run out of memory.
If the used memory hits that limit and continues to work away happily then garbage collection is doing its job.
If instead it bombs, then you have a real problem...

This does not seem to be leak as the graphs of the profiler also tell. The graph drops sharply after certain intervals i.e. when GC is performed. It would have been a leak had the graph kept climbing steadily. The heap space remaining after that must be used by the thread.sleep() and also (as mentioned in one of answers above) from the some code of the profiler.
You can try running VisualVM located at %JAVA_HOME%/bin and analyzing your application therein. It also gives you the option of performing GC at will and many more options.
I noted that the more features of VisualVM I used more memory was being consumed (upto 10MB). So this increase, it has to be from your profiler as well but it still is not a leak as space is reclaimed on GC.

Does this occur without the printlns? In other words, perhaps keeping the printlns displayed on the console is what is consuming the memory.

Why is the maximum size of the Java heap fixed?

It is not possible to increase the maximum size of Java's heap after the VM has started. What are the technical reasons for this? Do the garbage collection algorithms depend on having a fixed amount of memory to work with? Or is it for security reasons, to prevent a Java application from DOS'ing other applications on the system by consuming all available memory?

In Sun's JVM, last I knew, the entire heap must be allocated in a contiguous address space. I imagine that for large heap values, it's pretty hard to add to your address space after startup while ensuring it stays contiguous. You probably need to get it at startup, or not at all. Thus, it is fixed.
Even if it isn't all used immediately, the address space for the entire heap is reserved at startup. If it cannot reserve a large enough contiguous block of address space for the value of -Xmx that you pass it, it will fail to start. This is why it's tough to allocate >1.4GB heaps on 32-bit Windows - because it's hard to find contiguous address space in that size or larger, since some DLLs like to load in certain places, fragmenting the address space. This isn't really an issue when you go 64-bit, since there is so much more address space.
This is almost certainly for performance reasons. I could not find a terrific link detailing this further, but here is a pretty good quote from Peter Kessler (full link - be sure to read the comments) that I found when searching. I believe he works on the JVM at Sun.
The reason we need a contiguous memory
region for the heap is that we have a
bunch of side data structures that are
indexed by (scaled) offsets from the
start of the heap. For example, we
track object reference updates with a
"card mark array" that has one byte
for each 512 bytes of heap. When we
store a reference in the heap we have
to mark the corresponding byte in the
card mark array. We right shift the
destination address of the store and
use that to index the card mark array.
Fun addressing arithmetic games you
can't do in Java that you get to (have
to :-) play in C++.
This was in 2004 - I'm not sure what's changed since then, but I am pretty sure it still holds. If you use a tool like Process Explorer, you can see that the virtual size (add the virtual size and private size memory columns) of the Java application includes the total heap size (plus other required space, no doubt) from the point of startup, even though the memory 'used' by the process will be no where near that until the heap starts to fill up...

Historically there has been a reason for this limitiation, which was not to allow Applets in the browser to eat up all of the users memory. The Microsoft VM which never had such a limitiation actually allowed to do this which could lead to some sort of Denial of Service attack against the users computer. It was only a year ago that Sun introduced in the 1.6.0 Update 10 VM a way to let applets specify how much memory they want (limited to a certain fixed share of the physical memory) instead of always limiting them to 64MB even on computers that have 8GB or more available.
Now since the JVM has evolved it should have been possible to get rid of this limitation when the VM is not running inside a browser, but Sun obviously never considered it such a high priority issue even though there have been numerous bug reports been filed to finally allow the heap to grow.

I think the short, snarky, answer is because Sun hasn't found it worth the time and cost to develop.
The most compelling use case for such a feature is on the desktop, IMO, and Java has always been a disaster on the desktop when it comes to the mechanics of launching the JVM. I suspect that those who think the most about those issues tend to focus on the server side and view any other details best left to native wrappers. It is an unfortunate decision, but it should just be one of the decision points when deciding on the right platform for an application.

My gut feel is that it has to do with memory management with respect to the other applications running on the operating system.
If you set the maximum heap size to, for example, the amount of RAM on the box you effectively let the VM decide how much memory it requires (up to this limit). The problem with this is that the VM could effectively cripple the machine it is running on because it will take over all the memory on the box before it decides that it needs to garbage collect.
When you specify max heap size, what you're saying to the VM is, you are allowed to use this amount of memory before you need to start garbage collecting. You cannot have more because if you take more then the other applications running on the box will slow down and you will start swapping to the disk if you use more than this.
Also be aware that they are two values with respect to memory, that is "current heap size" and "max heap size". The current heap size is how much memory the heap size is currently using and, if it requires more it can resize the heap but it cannot resize the heap above the value of maximum heap size.

From IBM's performance tuning tips (so may not be directly applicable to Sun's VMs)
The Java heap parameters influence the behavior of garbage collection. Increasing the heap size supports more object creation. Because a large heap takes longer to fill, the application runs longer before a garbage collection occurs. However, a larger heap also takes longer to compact and causes garbage collection to take longer.
The JVM has thresholds it uses to manage the JVM's storage. When the thresholds are reached, the garbage collector gets invoked to free up unused storage. Therefore, garbage collection can cause significant degradation of Java performance. Before changing the initial and maximum heap sizes, you should consider the following information:
In the majority of cases you should set the maximum JVM heap size to value higher than the initial JVM heap size. This allows for the JVM to operate efficiently during normal, steady state periods within the confines of the initial heap but also to operate effectively during periods of high transaction volume by expanding the heap up to the maximum JVM heap size. In some rare cases where absolute optimal performance is required you might want to specify the same value for both the initial and maximum heap size. This will eliminate some overhead that occurs when the JVM needs to expand or contract the size of the JVM heap. Make sure the region is large enough to hold the specified JVM heap.
Beware of making the Initial Heap Size too large. While a large heap size initially improves performance by delaying garbage collection, a large heap size ultimately affects response time when garbage collection eventually kicks in because the collection process takes more time.
So, I guess the reason that you can't change the value at runtime is because it may not help: either you have enough space in your heap or you don't. Once you run out, a GC cycle will be triggered. If that doesn't free up the space, you're stuffed anyway. You'd need to catch the OutOfMemoryException, increase the heap size, and then retry you calculation, hoping that this time you have enough memory.
In general the VM won't use the maximum heap size unless you need it, so if you think you might need to expand the memory at runtime, you could just specify a large maximum heap size.
I admit that's all a bit unsatisfying, and seems a bit lazy, since I can imagine a reasonable garbage collection strategy which would increase the heap size when GC fails to free enough space. Whether my imagination translates to a high performance GC implementation is another matter though ;)