Hibernate & Spring Roo: org.hibernate.PersistentObjectException: detached entity passed to persist - java

I'm using Spring Roo to generate an entity based on a table(created on the MS SQL Server). The following is my sql script:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[JMSMessage](
[MessageID] [nvarchar](100) NOT NULL,
[Destination] [varchar](50) NOT
[Status] [varchar](15) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_JMSMessage] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[MessageID] ASC
) WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF,ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
Java entity generated by Spring Roo is
#Entity
#Table(schema = "dbo",name = "JMSMessage")
#Configurable
public class Jmsmessage {
#Column(name = "Destination", length = 50)
#NotNull
private String destination;
#Column(name = "Status", length = 15)
private String status;
public String getDestination() {
return destination;
}
public void setDestination(String destination) {
this.destination = destination;
}
public String getStatus() {
return status;
}
public void setStatus(String status) {
this.status = status;
}
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
#Column(name = "MessageID", length = 100)
private String messageId;
public String getMessageId() {
return this.messageId;
}
public void setMessageId(String id) {
this.messageId = id;
}
#PersistenceContext
transient EntityManager entityManager;
public static final EntityManager entityManager() {
EntityManager em = new Jmsmessage().entityManager;
if (em == null) throw new IllegalStateException("Entity manager has not been injected (is the Spring Aspects JAR configured as an AJC/AJDT aspects library?)");
return em;
}
public static Jmsmessage findJmsmessage(String messageId) {
if (messageId == null || messageId.length() == 0) return null;
return entityManager().find(Jmsmessage.class, messageId);
}
#Transactional
public void persist() {
if (this.entityManager == null) this.entityManager = entityManager();
this.entityManager.persist(this);
}
#Transactional
public void remove() {
if (this.entityManager == null) this.entityManager = entityManager();
if (this.entityManager.contains(this)) {
this.entityManager.remove(this);
} else {
Jmsmessage attached = Jmsmessage.findJmsmessage(this.messageId);
this.entityManager.remove(attached);
}
}
#Transactional
public void flush() {
if (this.entityManager == null) this.entityManager = entityManager();
this.entityManager.flush();
}
#Transactional
public void clear() {
if (this.entityManager == null) this.entityManager = entityManager();
this.entityManager.clear();
}
#Transactional
public Jmsmessage merge() {
if (this.entityManager == null) this.entityManager = entityManager();
Jmsmessage merged = this.entityManager.merge(this);
this.entityManager.flush();
return merged;
}
public String toString() {
return ReflectionToStringBuilder.toString(this, ToStringStyle.SHORT_PREFIX_STYLE);
}
}
Then when i run the following code to create an entity instance and try to persistent it, the program throws an PersistentObjectException saying "detached entity passed to persist".
Jmsmessage message = new Jmsmessage();
message.setMessageId("m1");
message.setDestination("queue1");
message.setStatus("status1");
message.persist(); // If i use message.merge(), it will throws another Sql exception saying "Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'MessageID'"
How can i make the persistent work, any suggestions? Thanks in advance!

You should not set a value for messageId, because you have the strategy to #GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
On another note, I notice that you have used the active record pattern that roo provides. I suggest that you change this to the DAO pattern since code like this in very uncommon in the Java/Spring/Hibernate world :)

You have ID generation strategy auto but you have assigned some id value in your entity. Meaning ORM engine will consider your fresh entity as detached entity since it got id and it will throw exception like trying to save detached entity.. if you try to merge the entity to overcome the problem , ORM engine will check the id you provided to the entity and it will not able to match any row against your entity since there is no such row with that primary key..
Bottom line of the error is, you are confusing the ORM engine with Id generation.
Hope This is helpful!

Related

JPA Criteria Tuple query fails with missing columns from join in group by clause (Spring Boot 2.7.8 and hibernate 5.6.14.Final)

I am trying to use the JPA Criteria API to filter the results and aggregate them using simple count, min, avg and max. I am using Spring Boot 2.7.8, so I am trying to use Interface-projections such that these aggregated results look the same as the simpler queries done automatically by the Spring repositories.
My domain entity (simplified for brevity) looks like this:
#Entity
#Table(name = "vehicle_stopped")
#IdClass(VehicleStopped.VehicleStoppedPK.class)
public class VehicleStopped implements Serializable {
#Id
#Column(name = "stopped_session_uuid", nullable = false)
private String stoppedSessionUuid;
#Id
#Column(name = "start_ts", nullable = false)
private OffsetDateTime startTs;
#Column(name = "end_ts", nullable = false)
private OffsetDateTime endTs;
#Column(name = "duration_seconds")
private Double durationSeconds;
#ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
#JoinColumn(name = "zone_id")
private CameraZone cameraZone;
#Override
public VehicleStoppedPK getId() {
VehicleStopped.VehicleStoppedPK pk = new VehicleStopped.VehicleStoppedPK();
pk.setStartTs(this.getStartTs());
pk.setStoppedSessionUuid(this.getStoppedSessionUuid());
return pk;
}
public OffsetDateTime getEndTs() {
return endTs;
}
public void setEndTs(OffsetDateTime endTs) {
this.endTs = endTs;
}
public Double getDurationSeconds() {
return durationSeconds;
}
public void setDurationSeconds(Double durationSeconds) {
this.durationSeconds = durationSeconds;
}
public CameraZone getCameraZone() {
return cameraZone;
}
public void setCameraZone(CameraZone cameraZone) {
this.cameraZone = cameraZone;
}
public VehicleType getVehicleType() {
return vehicleType;
}
public void setVehicleType(VehicleType vehicleType) {
this.vehicleType = vehicleType;
}
public String getStoppedSessionUuid() {
return stoppedSessionUuid;
}
public void setStoppedSessionUuid(String stoppedSessionUuid) {
this.stoppedSessionUuid = stoppedSessionUuid;
}
//some details removed for brevity
#Override
public static class VehicleStoppedPK implements Serializable {
private OffsetDateTime startTs;
private String stoppedSessionUuid;
public VehicleStoppedPK() {
}
public OffsetDateTime getStartTs() {
return startTs;
}
public void setStartTs(OffsetDateTime startTs) {
this.startTs = startTs;
}
public String getStoppedSessionUuid() {
return stoppedSessionUuid;
}
public void setStoppedSessionUuid(String stoppedSessionUuid) {
this.stoppedSessionUuid = stoppedSessionUuid;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
VehicleStoppedPK that = (VehicleStoppedPK) o;
return Objects.equals(startTs, that.startTs) && Objects.equals(stoppedSessionUuid, that.stoppedSessionUuid);
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(startTs, stoppedSessionUuid);
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "VehicleStoppedPK{" +
"startTs=" + startTs +
", stoppedSessionUuid='" + stoppedSessionUuid + '\'' +
'}';
}
}
}
#Entity
#Table(name = "camera_zone")
public class CameraZone implements Serializable {
#Id
#SequenceGenerator(name = "camera_zone_id_seq", sequenceName = "camera_zone_id_seq", allocationSize = 1)
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "camera_zone_id_seq")
#Column(name = "id", updatable=false)
private Integer id;
#Column(name = "uuid", unique = true)
private String uuid;
#Column(name = "type")
private String type;
#Column(name = "name")
private String name;
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getUuid() {
return uuid;
}
public void setUuid(String uuid) {
this.uuid = uuid;
}
public String getType() {
return type;
}
public void setType(String type) {
this.type = type;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
CameraZone that = (CameraZone) o;
return Objects.equals(id, that.id) && Objects.equals(uuid, that.uuid) && Objects.equals(camera, that.camera) && Objects.equals(type, that.type) && Objects.equals(name, that.name);
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(id, uuid, camera, type, name);
}
}
The code that I have in my Repository implementation looks like this:
public class SpecificationVehicleStoppedRepositoryImpl
implements SpecificationVehicleStoppedRepository {
#Autowired private EntityManager em;
#Autowired ProjectionFactory projectionFactory;
#Override
public List<VehicleStoppedAggregate> getStoppedVehiclesCount(Specification<VehicleStopped> spec) {
CriteriaBuilder builder = em.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Tuple> query = builder.createTupleQuery();
Root<VehicleStopped> root = query.from(VehicleStopped.class);
Predicate predicate = spec.toPredicate(root, query, builder);
if (predicate != null) {
query.where(predicate);
}
Path<Number> duration = root.get("durationSeconds");
Path<CameraZone> zone = root.get("cameraZone");
query
.multiselect(zone,
builder.count(root).alias("totalVehicles"),
builder.min(duration).alias("minDuration"),
builder.avg(duration).alias("avgDuration"),
builder.max(duration).alias("maxDuration"))
.groupBy(zone);
List<Tuple> rawResultList = em.createQuery(query).getResultList();
return project(rawResultList, VehicleStoppedAggregate.class);
}
private <P> List<P> project(List<Tuple> results, Class<P> projectionClass) {
return results.stream()
.map(tuple -> {
Map<String, Object> mappedResult = new HashMap<>(tuple.getElements().size());
for (TupleElement<?> element : tuple.getElements()) {
String name = element.getAlias();
mappedResult.put(name, tuple.get(name));
}
return projectionFactory.createProjection(projectionClass, mappedResult);
})
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
}
The interface-based projection I am trying to populate (using SpelAwareProxyProjectionFactory) is this:
public interface VehicleStoppedAggregate {
CameraZone getCameraZone();
Integer getTotalVehicles();
Double getMinDuration();
Double getAvgDuration();
Double getMaxDuration();
}
The call to getStoppedVehiclesCount() fails with the following error:
ERROR: column "camerazone1_.id" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
This error is coming from the PostgreSQL database, and rightly so because the SQL hibernate generates is incorrect:
select
vehiclesto0_.zone_id as col_0_0_,
count(*) as col_1_0_,
min(vehiclesto0_.duration_seconds) as col_2_0_,
avg(vehiclesto0_.duration_seconds) as col_3_0_,
max(vehiclesto0_.duration_seconds) as col_4_0_,
camerazone1_.id as id1_2_,
camerazone1_.name as name2_2_,
camerazone1_.type as type3_2_,
camerazone1_.uuid as uuid4_2_
from
vehicle_stopped vehiclesto0_
inner join
camera_zone camerazone1_
on vehiclesto0_.zone_id=camerazone1_.id cross
where
vehiclesto0_.start_ts>=?
and vehiclesto0_.start_ts<=?
and 1=1
and 1=1
and 1=1
group by
vehiclesto0_.zone_id
It is not grouping by the other fields it is requesting from the joined table.
If I had to use a normal class, instead of a Tuple, it would work, but it would mean I would have to create a class with a huge constructor for all fields for Hibernate to populate it.
Somehow, when I use Interface-based projections with Spring's repositories rather than my criteriaquery, the same scenario works. They manage to populate the one-to-many relationships just fine.
Is there a way to fix this and make Hibernate ask for the right fields?
I am using Hibernate 5.6.14.Final (as bundled with Spring Boot 2.7.8).
I believe the "solution" is two create two "independent" query roots and join them together:
CriteriaBuilder builder = session.getCriteriaBuilder();
CriteriaQuery<Tuple> query = builder.createTupleQuery();
Root<VehicleStopped> root = query.from(VehicleStopped.class);
// instead of Path<CameraZone> zone = root.get("cameraZone")
Root<CameraZone> zone = query.from(CameraZone.class);
query.where(builder.equal(zone, root.get("cameraZone")));
Path<Number> duration = root.get("durationSeconds");
query
.multiselect(zone,
builder.count(root).alias("totalVehicles"),
builder.min(duration).alias("minDuration"),
builder.avg(duration).alias("avgDuration"),
builder.max(duration).alias("maxDuration"))
.groupBy(zone);
session.createQuery(query).getResultList();
In that case Hibernate 5 produces following SQL (which actually looks weird from my perspective due to missing columns in group by clause):
select
naturalidc1_.id as col_0_0_,
count(*) as col_1_0_,
min(naturalidc0_.duration_seconds) as col_2_0_,
avg(naturalidc0_.duration_seconds) as col_3_0_,
max(naturalidc0_.duration_seconds) as col_4_0_,
naturalidc1_.id as id1_0_,
naturalidc1_.name as name2_0_,
naturalidc1_.type as type3_0_,
naturalidc1_.uuid as uuid4_0_
from
vehicle_stopped naturalidc0_ cross
join
camera_zone naturalidc1_
where
naturalidc1_.id=naturalidc0_.zone_id
group by
naturalidc1_.id
FYI. Your initial query does work in Hibernate 6 and produced SQL does look more correct but still weird:
select
c1_0.id,
c1_0.name,
c1_0.type,
c1_0.uuid,
count(*),
min(v1_0.duration_seconds),
avg(v1_0.duration_seconds),
max(v1_0.duration_seconds)
from
vehicle_stopped v1_0
join
camera_zone c1_0
on c1_0.id=v1_0.zone_id
group by
1,
2,
3,
4

Why ResponseEntity calls hibernate while lazy loading active

Below is the DAO. I am getting the first UppeningUsers object. Note that here for this function I do not want to return peopleWhoBlockedMe set which is located inside the UppeningUsers..
But in different functions I would like to return that information. Note that Both of them are LAZY fetching. With evict I tried to detach the object but still it did not work.
First of all RESTcontroller is below. Then the DAO code is below. Then two entity descriptions are below.
Question is: I see that until
return new ResponseEntity(returned, HttpStatus.OK);
There is only one query which is the typical select. I do not want hibernate to go and take also UserBlock information of that specific UppeningUser. Because it is not needed for this service response. However even though it is lazy loading for some reason
return new ResponseEntity(returned, HttpStatus.OK);
calls the hibernate. I dont know why in restcontroller still it is connected to the database. I tried evict but didnt work.
The json response is
{"id":7,"peopleWhoBlockedMe":[{"blockedId":7}]}
But I do not want for this function to return this peopleWhoBlockedMe. It can be empty.
PLEASE NOTE that in other service for example I will explictly request this peopleWhoBlockedMe but just for this business logic I do not need this information. So what I can do to prevent this so whenever I actually want to call peopleWhoBlockedMe I can get it. Not automaticly.
#RestController
public class TempController {
#Autowired
UppeningUsersService uppeningUsersService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/testing", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public ResponseEntity<UppeningUsers> getPhotos() {
try {
UppeningUsers returned = uppeningUsersService.getUsersDetailsPartial();
return new ResponseEntity<UppeningUsers>(returned, HttpStatus.OK);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
return null;
}
}
}
This part is the DAO.
#Repository
public class UppeningUsersDAO {
#Autowired
private SessionFactory sessionFactory;
public void setSessionFactory(SessionFactory sf) {
this.sessionFactory = sf;
}
/**
* Get Existing user. Return error if there is not.
* #param incomingUser user who requested access.
* #return returns the guy information. All information.
*/
#Transactional
public UppeningUsers getUserDetails() throws Exception {
Session session = this.sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
Query query = session.createQuery("from UppeningUsers ");
UppeningUsers returning = (UppeningUsers) query.list().get(0);
session.evict(returning);
return returning;
}
}
The main table is this one..
#Entity
#Table(name = "uppening_users")
#Proxy(lazy = true)
public class UppeningUsers {
#Id
#Column(name = "id")
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private
int id;
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "blockedId",cascade =CascadeType.ALL, fetch = FetchType.LAZY)
private Set<UserBlocks> peopleWhoBlockedMe;
public UppeningUsers() {
super();
}
public int getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(int id) {
this.id = id;
}
public Set<UserBlocks> getPeopleWhoBlockedMe() {
return peopleWhoBlockedMe;
}
public void setPeopleWhoBlockedMe(Set<UserBlocks> peopleWhoBlockedMes) {
this.peopleWhoBlockedMe = peopleWhoBlockedMes;
}
}
Now here is the other table.
#Entity
#Table(name="user_blocks")
#Proxy(lazy = true)
public class UserBlocks {
#Id
#Column(name="id")
#GeneratedValue(strategy= GenerationType.IDENTITY)
int id;
#Column(name = "blocked_id",insertable = false,updatable = false)
private int blockedId;
public int getBlockedId() {
return blockedId;
}
public void setBlockedId(int blockedId) {
this.blockedId = blockedId;
}
}
UPDATE: 2 forgot to add the service
#Service("uppeningUserService")
public class UppeningUsersService {
#Autowired
UppeningUsersDAO uppeningUsersDAO;
public UppeningUsers getUsersDetailsPartial( ) throws Exception {
return uppeningUsersDAO.getUserDetails();
}
}
Jens is right about her sentence. The layer methodology and writing business objects fix the issue. Thank you.

How to force EntityManager.persist() to do only insert and not update

I am trying to insert data into a table having columns (NAME, VALUE) with
EntityManager.persist().
When I persist an entity like ('xx', 'value1') it inserts a new record into the table for that entity. But if I want to persist a new entity like ('xx', 'value2'), the entity is persisted in the place of already existing record.
The questions are:
Why and how is it happened?
Is there a way to insert ('xx', 'value2') too?
I found a similar question here but there is no real answer for the question.
Many thanks.
UPDATE: The first column is not a primary key. Instead, the second one is.
Here is the Entity:
#Entity
#Table(name = "TEST_DATA")
public class TestDataEntity implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Column(name = "NAME", nullable = false)
private String name;
#Id
#Column(name = "VALUE", nullable = false)
private String value;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(String value) {
this.value = value;
}
}
And here is the persisting code:
#Transactional
public static void storeTestData(EntityManager em, String name, String value) {
TestDataEntity entity = new TestDataEntity();
entity.setName(name);
entity.setValue(value);
em.persist(entity);
}
Also, there is another question, which is described here.
The issue is solved this way:
#Transactional
public static void storeTestData(EntityManager em, String name, String value) {
EntityTransaction transaction = em.getTransaction();
try {
transaction.begin();
TestDataEntity entity = new TestDataEntity();
entity.setName(name);
entity.setValue(value);
em.persist(entity);
transaction.commit();
} catch (RuntimeException re) {
if (transaction != null && transaction.isActive()) {
transaction.rollback();
}
throw re;
}
This means, that if no explicit transaction is provided, then the existing record is being updated if it has any value matched with the corresponding field value in entity object.
IMHO, this is really strange and not straightforward, since it would be better if it would throw a
javax.persistence.TransactionRequiredException
like it does on update/delete statements.
Check if your entity correctly implements equals() and hashCode(), usually this solves the problem

Java Lazy Loading with Hibernate/JPA/Spring

I'm having an issue with converting an application to separate REST Server + Web Application rather than having a single application that handles pages + business logic.
I'm having a problem with an org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException being thrown when Jackson is serialising the output.
Below is my JPA configuration and the class in question. I'm aware the lazy initialisation is being caused by the List member, but I don't want this to be populated in the JSON returned. Hence the #JsonIgnore annotation.
PersistenceConfiguration.java
#Configuration
#EnableTransactionManagement
#EnableJpaRepositories(basePackageClasses = {ForumRepository.class})
public class PersistenceConfiguration {
#Bean
public EntityManagerFactory entityManagerFactory() {
HibernateJpaVendorAdapter vendorAdapter = new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter();
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean factory = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean();
factory.setJpaVendorAdapter(vendorAdapter);
factory.setPackagesToScan("com.mypackage.forum.api.models");
factory.setDataSource(secureDataSource());
factory.afterPropertiesSet();
return factory.getObject();
}
#Bean
public JpaTransactionManager transactionManager() {
EntityManagerFactory factory = entityManagerFactory();
return new JpaTransactionManager(factory);
}
#Bean
public HibernateExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator() {
return new HibernateExceptionTranslator();
}
#Bean
public DataSource secureDataSource() {
try {
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
return (DataSource) ctx.lookup("java:jboss/datasources/ForumDS");
} catch (Exception e) {
return null;
}
}
}
ForumGroup.java
#Entity
public class ForumGroup {
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
private Integer id;
#JsonIgnore
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "group")
private List<Forum> forums;
private String name;
private String description;
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public List<Forum> getForums() {
return forums;
}
public void setForums(List<Forum> forums) {
this.forums = forums;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getDescription() {
return description;
}
public void setDescription(String description) {
this.description = description;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o) return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
ForumGroup that = (ForumGroup) o;
if (id != null ? !id.equals(that.id) : that.id != null) return false;
if (name != null ? !name.equals(that.name) : that.name != null) return false;
return true;
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
int result = id != null ? id.hashCode() : 0;
result = 31 * result + (name != null ? name.hashCode() : 0);
return result;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "ForumGroup{" +
"id=" + id +
", name='" + name + '\'' +
", description='" + description + '\'' +
'}';
}
}
I presume that I need to configure some sort of Session Manager but not sure the best way to go about doing it in JavaConfig, I've tried various methods via Google with no joy.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Update
I've now managed to resolve this by 1) Adding the #Fetch() annotation to the relevant collections, which means that the collections get populated 2) I have stopped Entities/Models being returned as JSON objects and instead use separate DTOs
org.hibernate.LazyInitializationException happens when call lazy fields outside from session.
In your situation , it's seams you select ForumGroup entities and then, outside from session you trying call entity.getForums(). That's why happening LazyInitializationException.
If you need that collection, then load them eagerly. You can do that by calling:
entity.getForums().size();.Remember, call this inside the session
You can use anotation, to to load collection EAGERLY by default : #ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
You just need to fetch the ForumGroup along with its forums list.
This can be achieved with a LEFT JOIN FETCH whenever you retrieve the ForumGroup you are interested in:
"from ForumGroup as fg " +
"left join fetch fg.forums "
You can assign a default fetching strategy, but this is a decision that will affect subsequent queries, so make sure you know the trade-offs:
Use a join fetch mode:
#JsonIgnore
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "group")
#Fetch(FetchMode.JOIN)
private List<Forum> forums = new ArrayList<Forum>();
Or a sub-select fetch mode:
#JsonIgnore
#OneToMany(mappedBy = "group")
#Fetch(FetchMode.SUBSELECT)
private List<Forum> forums = new ArrayList<Forum>();
And always initialize your collections, never let them assigned to null.

JPA Entity found by find in a stateful ejb extended is not managed

I thought that an entity found by em.find was automatically managed by em, even out a transaction, but this class below seems to show the contrary. Was I wrong or what is the mistake in that class?
#Stateful
#TransactionAttribute(NOT_SUPPORTED)
public class CustomerGateway {
#PersistenceContext(unitName = "customersPU", type = EXTENDED)
private EntityManager em;
private Customer customer;
public Customer find(Long id) {
// customer is not managed!
this.customer = em.find(Customer.class, id);
// Print false!
System.out.println("Method find: " + em.contains(customer));
// Print false too (2 is the id of an entity)!
System.out.println("Method find: " + em.contains(em.find(Customer.class, 2L));
// A workaround
customer = em.merge(customer);
// Print true.
System.out.println("Method find after merge: " + em.contains(customer));
return this.customer;
}
EDIT 1: code of the entity
#Entity
#NamedQuery(name = "Customer.all", query = "select c from Customer c")
public class Customer implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
private Long id;
private String name;
public Customer() {
}
public Customer(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public Long getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Long id) {
this.id = id;
}
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
#Override
public int hashCode() {
int hash = 0;
hash += (id != null ? id.hashCode() : 0);
return hash;
}
#Override
public boolean equals(Object object) {
// TODO: Warning - this method won't work in the case the id fields are not set
if (!(object instanceof Customer)) {
return false;
}
Customer other = (Customer) object;
if ((this.id == null && other.id != null) || (this.id != null && !this.id.equals(other.id))) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
#Override
public String toString() {
return "entity.Customer[ id=" + id + " ]";
}
}
Code of the stateful EJB:
#Stateful
#TransactionAttribute(NOT_SUPPORTED)
public class CustomerGateway {
#PersistenceContext(type = PersistenceContextType.EXTENDED)
private EntityManager em;
private Customer customer;
public Customer getCustomer() {
return customer;
}
public void create(Customer customer) {
em.persist(customer);
this.customer = customer;
}
public Customer find(Long id) {
this.customer = em.find(Customer.class, id);
System.out.println("customer managed ? " + em.contains(this.customer));
// Workaround :
// this.customer = em.merge(customer);
return customer;
}
public void remove(Long id) {
Customer cust = em.getReference(Customer.class, id);
em.remove(cust);
}
#TransactionAttribute(REQUIRES_NEW)
public void save() {
}
public List<Customer> findAllCustomers() {
Query query = em.createNamedQuery("Customer.all");
return query.getResultList();
}
#Remove
public void close() {
}
}
I work with NetBeans 7.4, GlassFish 4.0, EJB 3.2, Java DB.
All that you have experienced is according to the spec. The persistence context remains (and the entities keeps attached) while the transaction exists. So, in a extended persistence context and a NOT_SUPPORTED transaction the objects retrieved by calling find method are dettached. -Also, if your Customer object has lazy relationships and you try to access them, then, it is highly probable that you will get a runtime exception.-
Now, why the merge method is just ok?. Well, first remember that merge returns a managed entity and is attaching the customer to the persistence context.
Second, you have an EXTENDED persistence context, so, it wont go to update the database until you call the #Remove annotated method. When this call arrives, you will probably get a TransactionRequiredException.
EDIT 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to your comments:
find is not required to be in a transaction, although, if you want managed object there must be one.
The paragraph is about EM the life cycle (3.3 section), in this case, tries to explain that at the end of a method for a transaction-scoped bean, the entities will be detached, but, in the case of extended EM the entities will remains attached.
There are 2 insightful paragraphs :
When an EM with an extended persistence context is used, the persist, remove, merge and refresh operations can be called regardless of whether a transaction is active. The effects of these operations will be committed to the database when the extended persistence context is enlisted in a transaction and the transaction commits.
The persistence context is closed by the container when the #Remove method of the stateful session bean completes (or the stateful session bean instance is otherwise destroyed).
Looks like the method that you initially omit in the question with #TransactionAttribute(REQUIRES_NEW) is the place where the merge occurs successfully. That's why you have no exception.
EDIT 2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After some testing, GF4 has a bug and has been reported > https://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-20968
EDIT 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20/May/2014 : The bug has been marked as : Must Fix for Glassfish 4.0.1.
According to Checkus, it seems to be a bug in GF4: https://java.net/jira/browse/GLASSFISH-20968

Categories

Resources