I'm trying to generate a code coverage report for a simple Maven plugin I've developed. Cobertura generates the report with the three classes in my project correctly, but it reports 0% code coverage even though the tests execute successfully. I've run it in debug mode and there are no errors or stack traces reported by Cobertura.
My configuration in the POM file is quite simple:
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-artifact</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compat</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-plugin-api</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-resources-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.6</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-core</artifactId>
<version>3.0.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugin-tools</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-plugin-annotations</artifactId>
<version>3.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<!-- version 2.1 uses sonatype aether. anything after 2.1 uses eclipse aether. -->
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugin-testing</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-plugin-testing-harness</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
<version>2.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.11</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.twdata.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>mojo-executor-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<type>maven-plugin</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>test-custom-plugin</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<forkMode>never</forkMode>
<forkCount>0</forkCount>
<reuseForks>true</reuseForks>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.1</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.6</source>
<target>1.6</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-plugin-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.2</version>
<configuration>
<goalPrefix>MyCustomPlugin</goalPrefix>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-descriptor</id>
<goals>
<goal>descriptor</goal>
</goals>
<phase>process-classes</phase>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>help-descriptor</id>
<goals>
<goal>helpmojo</goal>
</goals>
<phase>process-classes</phase>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>cobertura-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5.2</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Cobertura works on all of my other projects (so far), is there any reason that it would failing to report coverage for a Maven plugin project?
It seems the problem was with my surefire configuration. I changed it to
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.16</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>test-custom-plugin</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<forkCount>1</forkCount>
<reuseForks>true</reuseForks>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
and reports are now generated correctly. I got the idea for changing the fork options from a number of posts I'd seen of similar problems related to generating reports for sonar plugins, and changing the fork options resolved the issue.
Related
I've my architecture as follows.
Two Servers
moduleA/src/main/resources/fileA.proto
moduleB/src/main/resources/fileB.proto
Client (Browser facing server end point calling above two servers)
service/src/main
Issue/Question: I've the following POM in my moduleA to begin with but it's not generating stubs.
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId>
<artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId>
<version>3.6.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
<artifactId>grpc-netty-shaded</artifactId>
<version>1.15.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
<artifactId>grpc-protobuf</artifactId>
<version>1.15.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.grpc</groupId>
<artifactId>grpc-stub</artifactId>
<version>1.15.1</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<extensions>
<extension>
<groupId>kr.motd.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>os-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.5.0.Final</version>
</extension>
</extensions>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.xolstice.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>protobuf-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.5.1</version>
<configuration>
<protocArtifact>com.google.protobuf:protoc:3.9.0:exe:${os.detected.classifier}</protocArtifact>
<pluginId>grpc-java</pluginId>
<pluginArtifact>io.grpc:protoc-gen-grpc-java:1.22.1:exe:${os.detected.classifier}</pluginArtifact>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>compile</goal>
<goal>compile-custom</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
the proto file location should be src/main/proto/.
Also, the version of protobuf doesn't seem like matching. in dependency, protobuf version is 3.6.1 where the protoc plugin is using 3.9.0.
I am working on sonar code coverage using Jacoco plugin and using power mock mockito combination to write JUnit test cases, while all goes well with the build when I run mvn clean install but the console shows a very very long stack trace chain which keeps coming for many many classes used in the project, and is quite irritating,
The exception trace is similar to below-
java.lang.instrument.IllegalClassFormatException: Error while instrumenting class..
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Error while instrumenting class.
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Class <class-name> is already instrumented.
I went through below link for a solution but could not get a way out:-
https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/32
The link says "The error indicates that there are two JaCoCo agents configured for the same process, Looks like activation of surefire-report-plugin leads to a doubled agent, which is not an exceptional case, but an error in configuration of JVM for tests" In my case it is not even doubled agent I guess as my argLine has set to only one jacoco agent.
In my case, the argLine is set to below-
javaagent:C:\\Users\\user\\.m2\\repository\\org\\jacoco\\org.jacoco.agent\\0.7.6.201602180812\\org.jacoco.agent-0.7.6.201602180812-runtime.jar=destfile=C:Users\\user\\git\\package\\target\\jacoco.exec
My pom.xml entry for jacoco-sonar configuration is as below -
<properties>
<sonar.sources>src/main/java</sonar.sources>
<sonar.tests>src/test/java</sonar.tests>
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<sonar.binaries>${project.basedir}/target/classes</sonar.binaries>
<sonar.inclusions>
**/com/abc/service/impl/ABCServiceImpl.java,
**/com/abc/dao/impl/ABCDAOImpl.java
</sonar.inclusions>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.20</version>
<configuration>
<skipTests>false</skipTests>
<argLine>-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m ${argLine}</argLine>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.6.201602180812</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-instrument</id>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-restore-instrumented-classes</id>
<goals>
<goal>restore-instrumented-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-report</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Note: If I remove the execution element for 'default-instrument' and 'default-restore-instrumented-classes' than the exception trace does not come but I get coverage = 0.0% on sonar dashboard, using these two execution elements give me correct code coverage but with lengthy stack trace on the console. Any help is appreciated.
As per my insight into this research:
It is possible to also use offline-instrumented classes with the JaCoCo Java agent. In this case, the configuration is taken from the agent options. The agent must be configured in a way that pre-instrumented classes are excluded, e.g. with " excludes=* ". Otherwise it will result in error messages on the console if the agent instruments such classes again likewise in your case.
The agent jacocoagent.jar is part of the JaCoCo distribution and includes all required dependencies. A Java agent can be activated with the following JVM option:
-javaagent:[yourpath/]jacocoagent.jar=[option1]=[value1],[option2]=[value2]
For JaCoCo agent options, consider the following link:
http://www.jacoco.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/agent.html
I've also faced the same issue, but with Gradle. For me, the problem was with the following instructions
debug {
testCoverageEnabled true
}
which I've added in accordance with one tutorial. It also instruments classes (as Jacoco does) and thus the exceptions are thrown.
Removing this instruction solved the problem for me.
I use mockito instead of powermock, but I do not think that there is any difference for the usage with sonar. I use the Sonar Maven Scanner for the anlysis and it works like a charm.
My pom.xml contains the following properties
<properties>
<project.source.version>1.8</project.source.version>
<project.target.version>${project.source.version}</project.target.version>
<sonar.scanner.version>3.3.0.603</sonar.scanner.version>
<jacoco.maven.version>0.7.9</jacoco.maven.version>
<sonar.projectName>MyProject</sonar.projectName>
<sonar.projectKey>my-project-key</sonar.projectKey>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
</properties>
and the plugins are configured as follows
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.5.1</version>
<inherited>true</inherited>
<configuration>
<source>${project.source.version}</source>
<target>${project.target.version}</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.sonarsource.scanner.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${sonar.scanner.version}</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.maven.version}</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
You can run the analysis with
mvn clean install sonar:sonar
This generates a the default exec file lacated at target/jacoco.exec wich will be used by your local sonarqube server and contains also the coverage.
Updated answer
Tested it with powermock. I used the powermock jacoco-offline example and just adapted it a little bit.
The pom.xml is then
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
4.0.0
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-offline</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>JaCoCo Offline with PowerMock</name>
<description>
Example how to get code coverage with PowerMock
</description>
<properties>
<jacoco.version>0.7.9</jacoco.version>
<sonar.scanner.version>3.3.0.603</sonar.scanner.version>
<!-- Used to locate the profile specific configuration file. -->
<build.profile.id>dev</build.profile.id>
<jacoco.it.execution.data.file>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-it.exec</jacoco.it.execution.data.file>
<jacoco.ut.execution.data.file>${project.build.directory}/coverage-reports/jacoco-ut.exec</jacoco.ut.execution.data.file>
<jdk.version>1.8</jdk.version>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<!-- Only unit tests are run by default. -->
<skip.unit.tests>false</skip.unit.tests>
<powermock.version>1.7.0</powermock.version>
<maven.compiler.source>1.6</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.6</maven.compiler.target>
<mockito1.version>1.10.19</mockito1.version>
<mockito2.version>2.8.9</mockito2.version>
<easymock.version>3.4</easymock.version>
<assertj-core.version>3.8.0</assertj-core.version>
<junit.version>4.12</junit.version>
<spring.version>3.0.5.RELEASE</spring.version>
<commons-lang3.version>3.4</commons-lang3.version>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/target/coverage.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.assertj</groupId>
<artifactId>assertj-core</artifactId>
<version>${assertj-core.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-core</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>org.jacoco.agent</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<classifier>runtime</classifier>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-core</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito2</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito-common</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-support</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4-rule</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-classloading-xstream</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4-rule-agent</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-easymock</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-testng</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
<version>${powermock.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.easymock</groupId>
<artifactId>easymock</artifactId>
<version>${easymock.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-core</artifactId>
<version>${mockito1.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>${junit.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-core</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-context</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-test</artifactId>
<version>${spring.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.commons</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-lang3</artifactId>
<version>${commons-lang3.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.1</version>
<configuration>
<source>${jdk.version}</source>
<target>${jdk.version}</target>
<encoding>${project.build.sourceEncoding}</encoding>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-instrument</id>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-restore-instrumented-classes</id>
<goals>
<goal>restore-instrumented-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<phase>prepare-package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<dataFile>${project.build.directory}/coverage.exec</dataFile>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.19.1</version>
<configuration>
<systemPropertyVariables>
<jacoco-agent.destfile>${project.build.directory}/coverage.exec</jacoco-agent.destfile>
</systemPropertyVariables>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.sonarsource.scanner.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>sonar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${sonar.scanner.version}</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Thats all basic and you are right, I also missed the coverage. After run mvn clean install you can see the coverage.exec in the target folder. By default sonar is looking for a jacoco.exec file.
You can adapt this behaviour by just adding
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/target/coverage.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
to the properties section in the pom.xml. After running mvn clean install sonar:sonar again the coverage is present in my local sonarqube. Hope this helps you more...
If you are using pom.xml and jacoco plugin for build then you need to update the configuration at "prepare-agent" stage of build so that pre-instrumented classes are excluded as follows.
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>default-instrument</id>
<goals>
<goal>instrument</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>default-restore-instrumented-classes</id>
<goals>
<goal>restore-instrumented-classes</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>prepare-agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<excludes>
<exclude>*</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>report</id>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
This works for me
debug {
// disable testCoverage to fix Jacoco instrument error
testCoverageEnabled false
}
I am currently working on a project where I want to generate an ANTLR parser from a grammar and continue working with that parser inside my Scala code.
For this, I set up a new project with the following POM file:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>foo</groupId>
<artifactId>bar</artifactId>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>${project.artifactId}</name>
<description>Foo</description>
<properties>
<maven.compiler.source>1.6</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>1.6</maven.compiler.target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
<scala.version>2.11.5</scala.version>
<scala.compat.version>2.11</scala.compat.version>
<antlr.version>4.7</antlr.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scala-lang</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-library</artifactId>
<version>${scala.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.antlr</groupId>
<artifactId>antlr4-runtime</artifactId>
<version>${antlr.version}</version>
</dependency>
<!-- Test -->
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.11</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.specs2</groupId>
<artifactId>specs2-core_${scala.compat.version}</artifactId>
<version>2.4.16</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.scalatest</groupId>
<artifactId>scalatest_${scala.compat.version}</artifactId>
<version>2.2.4</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>net.alchim31.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.2.1</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.0.2</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.antlr</groupId>
<artifactId>antlr4-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${antlr.version}</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>net.alchim31.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>scala-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>scala-compile-first</id>
<phase>process-resources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>add-source</goal>
<goal>compile</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>scala-test-compile</id>
<phase>process-test-resources</phase>
<goals>
<goal>testCompile</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<phase>compile</phase>
<goals>
<goal>compile</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<configuration>
<useFile>false</useFile>
<disableXmlReport>true</disableXmlReport>
<!-- If you have classpath issue like NoDefClassError,... -->
<!-- useManifestOnlyJar>false</useManifestOnlyJar -->
<includes>
<include>**/*Test.*</include>
<include>**/*Suite.*</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.antlr</groupId>
<artifactId>antlr4-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>antlr</id>
<goals>
<goal>antlr4</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<visitor>true</visitor>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</project>
Compiling a project with a grammar file in the default location works just fine - Java sources are generated to target/generated-sources/antlr as expected.
However, I can not import the generated parser (let's call it FooParser) inside my Scala code - IntelliJ recognizes that there is something called
FooParser but when I try to auto-import it, it fails.
Also, building from the command line with mvn compile with source code
depending on the FooParser fails.
Resolution of the whole thing was rather dumb:
My file structure was wrong:
src/
main/
antlr/
Foo.g4
You have to put your grammars into proper packages, otherwise
the whole thing wont be properly 'importable'.
src/
main/
antlr/
packagename/
Foo.g4
I downloaded the RavenDB Java client 3.2.1 jar from here, created a new Java project in Ecplise, added the jar to the list of references, then took these three lines
IDocumentStore store = new DocumentStore(ravenDbUrl, "todo-db");
store.initialize();
store.executeIndex(new TodoByTitleIndex());
from here, replaced the values with my db-specific names, and expected some sign of life from the db. Instead, I'm getting "Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang/StringUtils".
I must admit, it's been a while since I've done Java, but surely this isn't missing something glaringly obvious, is it ?!
I have included the commons-lang3-3.5.jar file as well, but it's not taking that. Could you please point me in the right direction ?
Thanks !
Adding the "official" pom to my Eclipse project made it compile and run.
For the record, here's the pom, in case someone needs a base from which to investigate:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>net.ravendb</groupId>
<artifactId>ravendb-parent</artifactId>
<version>3.2.1</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>ravendb-client</artifactId>
<name>RavenDB Java Client</name>
<properties>
<queryDsl.version>3.1.1</queryDsl.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.mysema.querydsl</groupId>
<artifactId>querydsl-apt</artifactId>
<version>${queryDsl.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-codec</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-codec</artifactId>
<version>1.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-lang</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-lang</artifactId>
<version>2.6</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-io</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-io</artifactId>
<version>1.3.2</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-beanutils</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-beanutils</artifactId>
<version>1.8.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.httpcomponents</groupId>
<artifactId>httpclient</artifactId>
<version>4.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.jackson</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-mapper-asl</artifactId>
<version>1.9.12</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>de.undercouch</groupId>
<artifactId>bson4jackson</artifactId>
<version>1.3.0</version>
</dependency>
<!-- test deps -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.mysema.querydsl</groupId>
<artifactId>querydsl-collections</artifactId>
<version>${queryDsl.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>4.11</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.reflections</groupId>
<artifactId>reflections</artifactId>
<version>0.9.9-RC1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-all</artifactId>
<version>1.8.4</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.7</source>
<target>1.7</target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.mysema.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>apt-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.1.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>querydsl-test</id>
<goals>
<goal>test-process</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>target/generated-test-sources/java</outputDirectory>
<processor>net.ravendb.querydsl.RavenDBAnnotationProcessor</processor>
<options>
<querydsl.entityAccessors>true</querydsl.entityAccessors>
</options>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-jar-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<configuration>
<archive>
<manifestEntries>
<Source-Hash>${sourceHash}</Source-Hash>
</manifestEntries>
</archive>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>versions-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<!-- version 2.2 has bug: https://github.com/mojohaus/versions-maven-plugin/issues/51 -->
<version>2.1</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>pack</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.4</version>
<configuration>
<descriptors>
<descriptor>src/main/assembly/dist.xml</descriptor>
</descriptors>
<attach>false</attach>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>make-assembly</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>single</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>coverage</id>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.15</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.6.2.201302030002</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-initialize</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
<execution>
<id>jacoco-site</id>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>report</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
</profiles>
</project>
I have been searching but haven't found an answer. Is there anyway of opening the report index.html automatically after running a test in the terminal or in intellij? Im pretty new to this stuff. Thanks for any help.
Set up
-http://www.thucydides.info/#/
-junit
-selenium
Thank you for any future help.
Here is a copy of my pom.xml
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<junit.version>4.12</junit.version>
<serenity.version>1.0.47</serenity.version>
<serenity.maven.version>1.1.29-rc.1</serenity.maven.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>${junit.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seleniumhq.selenium</groupId>
<artifactId>selenium-java</artifactId>
<version>2.52.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.serenity-bdd</groupId>
<artifactId>core</artifactId>
<version>${serenity.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>net.serenity-bdd</groupId>
<artifactId>serenity-junit</artifactId>
<version>${serenity.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-jdk14</artifactId>
<version>1.7.18</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-failsafe-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<goals>
<goal>integration-test</goal>
<goal>verify</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<includes>
<include>**/*Test.java</include>
<include>**/When*.java</include>
</includes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.18.1</version>
<configuration>
<skip>true</skip>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.3</version>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>net.serenity-bdd.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>serenity-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${serenity.maven.version}</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.inject</groupId>
<artifactId>guice</artifactId>
<version>3.0</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>serenity-reports</id>
<phase>post-integration-test</phase>
<goals>
<goal>aggregate</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-clean-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>auto-clean</id>
<phase>initialize</phase>
<goals>
<goal>clean</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<filesets>
<fileset>
<directory>/target/site/serenity</directory>
</fileset>
</filesets>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<reporting>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-project-info-reports-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.8</version>
<reportSets>
<reportSet>
<reports>
<report>index</report>
<report>summary</report>
</reports>
</reportSet>
</reportSets>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</reporting>
How about adding:
#AfterClass
directly to your Runner class and adding method with:
getDriver().get("YourReportPath")